Zheng Sijin, Brutus Nicholas, Rivera Alexis, O'Marr Jamieson M, Gardezi Mursal, Grimshaw Alyssa A, Malcolm Kenyer, Marcellon Roselande, Mason Hyacinth R, Cavallo Jaime A
Acad Med. 2025 Apr 1;100(4):507-521. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005877. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
This comprehensive scoping review of the medical literature on first-generation low-income (FGLI) individuals in medicine aimed to synthesize the highest levels of evidence to inform medical education stakeholders.
Database searches were conducted in Academic Search Premier, Education Research Premier, ERIC, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Professional Development Collection, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science Core Collection from database inception through March 15, 2023. English-language articles on first-generation or low-income individuals in medicine from U.S. medical schools were included. Articles were evaluated for level of evidence and themes chosen.
Database searches resulted in 27,075 citations, 247 of which qualified for data extraction. The articles were classified by evidence level: level I (n = 2), level II (n = 17), level III (n = 90), level IV (n = 78), and level V (n = 60). Publications reported on 9 major outcomes: exam performance (n = 108), medical school performance (n = 63), residency and fellowship performance (n = 7), honor society status (n = 12), leave of absence (n = 9), withdrawal, dismissal, and attrition (n = 20), medical education graduation (n = 37), career choice (n = 109), and intent to practice in disadvantaged and rural communities (n = 60). Compared with their peers, FGLI individuals had lower medical school and standardized exam scores, enrollment in national medical honor societies and multiple degree programs, and graduate medical education performance and higher rates of leaves of absence, incompletion of medical education, pursuing primary care and family medicine specialties, and intent to practice in underserved communities.
Despite an increase in the number of FGLI individuals in medicine, there remains significant opportunity to improve their inclusion and support. Multi-institutional, prospective, risk-adjusted, observational studies are required to determine how to best support FGLI individuals through all medical career stages.
本项对医学领域关于第一代低收入(FGLI)个体的医学文献进行的全面范围综述,旨在综合最高水平的证据,为医学教育利益相关者提供信息。
从数据库建立至2023年3月15日,在学术搜索高级版、教育研究高级版、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、专业发展文集、PubMed、Scopus、谷歌学术和科学网核心合集数据库中进行检索。纳入来自美国医学院的关于第一代或低收入医学个体的英文文章。对文章的证据水平和所选主题进行评估。
数据库检索得到27,075条引文,其中247条符合数据提取条件。文章按证据水平分类:I级(n = 2)、II级(n = 17)、III级(n = 90)、IV级(n = 78)和V级(n = 60)。出版物报告了9个主要结果:考试成绩(n = 108)、医学院学习表现(n = 63)、住院医师和专科培训表现(n = 7)、荣誉学会会员身份(n = 12)、请假(n = 9)、退学、开除和流失(n = 20)、医学教育毕业(n = 37)、职业选择(n = 109)以及在弱势和农村社区执业的意向(n = 60)。与同龄人相比,FGLI个体的医学院和标准化考试成绩较低,在全国医学荣誉学会和多个学位项目中的入学率较低,毕业后医学教育表现较差,请假率较高,医学教育未完成率较高,从事初级保健和家庭医学专业的比例较高,以及在服务不足社区执业的意向较高。
尽管医学领域FGLI个体的数量有所增加,但在改善对他们的接纳和支持方面仍有很大机会。需要开展多机构、前瞻性、风险调整后的观察性研究,以确定如何在医学职业生涯的各个阶段最好地支持FGLI个体。