Suppr超能文献

在南非新冠疫情期间,根据世界卫生组织伦理标准和南非卫生产品监管局指南,对社交媒体上药品和草药促销活动的评估:横断面内容分析

Evaluation of Drug and Herbal Medicinal Promotions on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Relation to World Health Organization Ethical Criteria and South African Health Products Regulatory Authority Guidelines in South Africa: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.

作者信息

Chimukuche Rujeko Samanthia, Ndlazi Julia, Mtolo Lucky Thembani, Bird Kristien, Seeley Janet

机构信息

Social Sciences Core, Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.

Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Online J Public Health Inform. 2024 Sep 18;16:e58378. doi: 10.2196/58378.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Consideration of ethics in the promotion of medications is essential to safeguard the health of consumers, particularly during health crises. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) have established stringent standards to ensure the integrity of pharmaceutical promotions and safeguard public health, including advertisements on the internet and social media platforms. However, the dynamic nature of online advertising poses challenges for monitoring and enforcing ethical standards.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed (1) to examine the COVID-19 drug and medicinal promotions across online platforms and social media from 2020 to 2022 in South Africa and (2) to ensure that drug promotions adhere to ethical guidelines outlined by the WHO and SAPHRA.

METHODS

A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted to assess drug and medicinal advertisements across various internet and social media platforms. A systematic approach was used to identify and analyze promotional content, focusing on adherence to ethical guidelines outlined by WHO and SAPHRA. Data were collected and analyzed to determine the extent of compliance and identify any potential violations or areas for improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 14 online drug advertisements were included in this analysis. Our findings show that most of the drugs advertised did not meet the regulations and guidelines provided by WHO and SAHPRA. There were omissions about active ingredients, proprietary names, adverse drug responses, precautions, and overdosage and adverse drug reactions. Traditional medicines were not fully consistent with the approved WHO ethical criteria data sheet.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis highlights the critical importance of ensuring compliance with ethical guidelines in drug promotions on the internet and social media platforms. There is a need for continued vigilance and enforcement efforts to uphold ethical standards and protect the health of the public. Ongoing monitoring and collaboration between national drug regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and online platforms will be essential for promoting responsible advertising. In addition, safety monitoring and pharmacovigilance systems for herbal medicinal products are yet to be established.

摘要

背景

在药品推广中考虑伦理道德对于保护消费者健康至关重要,尤其是在健康危机期间。世界卫生组织(WHO)和南非卫生产品监管局(SAHPRA)已制定严格标准,以确保药品推广的诚信并保护公众健康,包括互联网和社交媒体平台上的广告。然而,在线广告的动态性质给监测和执行道德标准带来了挑战。

目的

该研究旨在(1)调查2020年至2022年南非在线平台和社交媒体上的新冠病毒药物及药品推广情况,以及(2)确保药品推广符合WHO和SAHPRA概述的道德准则。

方法

进行了一项横断面内容分析,以评估各种互联网和社交媒体平台上的药品广告。采用系统方法识别和分析推广内容,重点关注是否符合WHO和SAHPRA概述的道德准则。收集并分析数据,以确定合规程度,并识别任何潜在违规行为或改进领域。

结果

本分析共纳入14则在线药品广告。我们的研究结果表明,大多数广告药品不符合WHO和SAHPRA提供的法规和指南。在活性成分、商品名、药物不良反应、注意事项以及过量用药和药物不良反应方面存在遗漏。传统药物与WHO批准的道德标准数据表不完全一致。

结论

我们的分析凸显了确保互联网和社交媒体平台上药品推广符合道德准则的至关重要性。需要持续保持警惕并加强执法力度,以维护道德标准并保护公众健康。国家药品监管机构、制药公司和在线平台之间持续的监测与合作对于促进负责任的广告宣传至关重要。此外,草药产品的安全监测和药物警戒系统尚未建立。

相似文献

6
[Drug advertising and promotion: regulations and extent of compliance in five Latin American countries].
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011 Feb;29(2):76-83. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892011000200002.
7
Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters.
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015 Aug 25;4(12):813-21. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.157.
8
A study of promotional advertisements of drugs in a medical journal: an ethics perspective.
Indian J Med Ethics. 2014 Oct-Dec;11(4):237-41. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2014.059.

本文引用的文献

2
A Systematic Review of Pharmacovigilance Systems in Developing Countries Using the WHO Pharmacovigilance Indicators.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):717-743. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00415-y. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Effective Pharmacovigilance System Development: EFPIA-IPVG Consensus Recommendations.
Drug Saf. 2021 Jan;44(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01008-0. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
Self-medication during Covid-19 pandemic: challenges and opportunities.
Drugs Ther Perspect. 2020;36(12):565-567. doi: 10.1007/s40267-020-00785-z. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
7
Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisement and Prescribing Practices: Evidence Review and Practical Guidance for Clinicians.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 May;36(5):1390-1394. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06218-x. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
8
When fear and misinformation go viral: Pharmacists' role in deterring medication misinformation during the 'infodemic' surrounding COVID-19.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Jan;17(1):1954-1963. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.032. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Addressing the challenges of regulatory systems strengthening in small states.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 2;5(2):e001912. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001912. eCollection 2020.
10
Medicines Information and the Regulation of the Promotion of Pharmaceuticals.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1167-1192. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0041-5. Epub 2018 May 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验