Department of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Blood Adv. 2024 Dec 10;8(23):6043-6054. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024013777.
Approximately 25% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) present with extreme thrombocytosis (ExT), defined as having a platelet count ≥1000 × 109/L. ExT patients may have an increased bleeding risk associated with acquired von Willebrand syndrome. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of bleeding and thrombosis in ExT vs non-ExT patients with ET at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Massachusetts General Hospital from 2014 to 2022 to inform treatment decisions. We abstracted the first major bleed, clinically relevant nonmajor bleed (CRNMB), and thrombotic events from medical records. We identified 128 ExT patients (28%) and 323 non-ExT patients (72%). Cumulative incidence of bleeding was not different in ExT vs non-ExT patients (21% vs 13% [P = .28] for major bleed; 16% vs 15% [P = .50] for CRNMB). Very low and low thrombotic risk ExT patients were more likely to be cytoreduced than very low- and low-risk non-ExT patients (69% vs 50% [P = .060] for very low risk; 83% vs 53% [P = .0059] for low risk). However, we found no differences in bleeding between ExT and non-ExT patients when restricting the risk of bleed from diagnosis to cytoreduction start date (28% vs 19% [P = .29] for major bleed; 24% vs 22% [P = .75] for CRNMB). Cumulative incidence of thrombosis was also not different between ExT and non-ExT patients (28% vs 25%; P = .98). This suggests that cytoreduction may not be necessary to reduce bleeding risk based only on a platelet count of 1 million. We identified novel risk factors for bleeding in patients with ET including diabetes mellitus and the DNMT3A mutation.
约 25%的原发性血小板增多症 (ET) 患者存在极度血小板增多症 (ExT),定义为血小板计数≥1000×109/L。ExT 患者可能存在获得性血管性血友病综合征相关的出血风险增加。我们回顾性分析了 2014 年至 2022 年期间达纳-法伯癌症研究所和马萨诸塞州综合医院的 ET 中 ExT 与非 ExT 患者的出血和血栓形成风险,以辅助治疗决策。我们从病历中提取了首次大出血、临床相关非大出血 (CRNMB) 和血栓事件。我们确定了 128 名 ExT 患者(28%)和 323 名非 ExT 患者(72%)。ExT 与非 ExT 患者的出血累积发生率无差异(大出血:21% vs 非 ExT 患者 13%[P=.28];CRNMB:16% vs 非 ExT 患者 15%[P=.50])。极低危和低危 ExT 患者比极低危和低危非 ExT 患者更有可能接受细胞减少治疗(极低危:69% vs 非 ExT 患者 50%[P=.060];低危:83% vs 非 ExT 患者 53%[P=.0059])。然而,当将出血风险从诊断限制到细胞减少治疗开始日期时,我们发现 ExT 与非 ExT 患者之间的出血无差异(大出血:28% vs 非 ExT 患者 19%[P=.29];CRNMB:24% vs 非 ExT 患者 22%[P=.75])。ExT 与非 ExT 患者的血栓累积发生率也无差异(28% vs 25%;P=.98)。这表明,仅根据血小板计数为 100 万,细胞减少治疗可能不是降低出血风险的必要手段。我们确定了 ET 患者出血的新危险因素,包括糖尿病和 DNMT3A 突变。