High-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Valve Area >1.0 cm: The "Forgotten" Discordant Hemodynamic Phenotype.

BACKGROUND

Clinical features and outcomes in severe aortic stenosis (AS) have been described according to the hemodynamic phenotypes.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features and prognosis of patients with high-gradient (HG) AS with aortic valve area (AVA) >1.0 cm.

METHODS

A total of 3,209 patients were identified according to AVA (cm), peak velocity (m/s), systolic mean pressure gradient (MG) (mm Hg): HG-AVA >1 = >1.0, ≥4, and ≥40, HG-AVA ≤1 = ≤1.0, ≥4, and ≥40; LG-AVA ≤1 (low-gradient) = ≤1.0, <4, and <40; moderate AS = 1.0 <AVA ≤1.5, 3 ≤ peak velocity <4, and 20 ≤ MG <40.

RESULTS

HG-AVA >1 accounted for 230 individuals (7.2%). Compared with others, patients with HG-AVA >1 were younger (70.2 ± 12.0 years), more frequently male (85.7%), had fewer comorbidities, larger body surface area and stroke volume (115 ± 19.3 mL), and had higher prevalence of bicuspid valve (39.6%). After a follow-up of 944 days (Q1-Q3: 27-2,212 days), 1,523 deaths occurred. Compared with the HG-AVA >1 group, all-cause mortality was higher in HG-AVA ≤1 (HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.7), LG-AVA ≤1 (HR: 2.8; 95% CI: 2.2-3.6), and moderate AS (HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1-1.7). These differences were no longer significant after adjustment for age, comorbidities, bicuspid valve, and cardiac function. In the HG-AVA >1 group, patients with aortic valve replacement had better survival outcomes than those without aortic valve replacement (P < 0.001) after balancing the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The underlying relative high-flow status is responsible for HG in patients with HG-AVA >1. This profile has better prognosis than others, being related to underlying younger age and better general and cardiac conditions, but aortic valve replacement may still benefit these patients.