Suppr超能文献

达芬奇机器人辅助与开放卡塞氏 Portoenterostomy 治疗胆道闭锁的比较。

Comparison of Da Vinci Robotic-Assisted with Open Kasai Portoenterostomy for Biliary Atresia.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children Hospital of Guizhou Province, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou 563000, PR China.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children Hospital of Guizhou Province, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou 563000, PR China.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2024 Dec;59(12):161689. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161689. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy (RAKPE) has been used to treat biliary atresia (BA). This study aimed to compare the efficacy of RAKPE and open Kasai portoenterostomy (OKPE) for BA.

METHODS

Thirty-one children with type III BA who underwent surgical treatment in two centers from January 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected. According to the operative techniques, the participants were divided into the RAKPE group (13 cases) and the OKPE group (18 cases). The operative time, jaundice clearance (JC) rate, and incidence of cholangitis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The operative time in the RAKPE group (204.3 ± 19.9 min) was significantly longer than that in the OKPE group (186.2 ± 22.2 min), P < 0.05. However, the blood loss (8.1 ± 2.5 ml) in the RAKPE group was significantly decreased compared with the OKPE group (13.6 ± 4.8 ml), and 15.4% patient need blood transfusion in RAKEP group was litter than that 55.6% in the OKPE group, P < 0.05. The time to oral feeding (2.8 ± 0.4 days vs. 4.3 ± 0.7 days) and the time to pass ICG-positive stools (3.6 ± 0.6 days vs. 4.7 ± 0.9 days) in the RAKPE group were significantly shorter than those in the OKPE group, P < 0.05. No significant differences were observed in the bile excretion rate, hospital stay time, and JC rate. The incidence of cholangitis in the RAKPE group was significantly lower than that in the OKPE group during short follow-up.

CONCLUSION

RAKPE may be associated with lower intraoperative blood loss, decrease need for postoperative transfusions and decreased rate of postoperative cholangitis compared to OKPE.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

机器人辅助Kasai 门腔分流术(RAKPE)已被用于治疗胆道闭锁(BA)。本研究旨在比较 RAKPE 和开腹 Kasai 门腔分流术(OKPE)治疗 BA 的疗效。

方法

回顾性收集 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月在两个中心接受手术治疗的 31 例 III 型 BA 患儿。根据手术方式将患儿分为 RAKPE 组(13 例)和 OKPE 组(18 例)。分析手术时间、黄疸消退率和胆管炎发生率。

结果

RAKPE 组的手术时间(204.3±19.9 min)明显长于 OKPE 组(186.2±22.2 min),P<0.05。然而,RAKPE 组的出血量(8.1±2.5 ml)明显少于 OKPE 组(13.6±4.8 ml),RAKPE 组 15.4%的患者需要输血,明显少于 OKPE 组的 55.6%,P<0.05。RAKPE 组开始口服喂养的时间(2.8±0.4 天)和 ICG 阳性粪便排出时间(3.6±0.6 天)明显短于 OKPE 组(4.3±0.7 天和 4.7±0.9 天),P<0.05。两组胆汁排泄率、住院时间和黄疸消退率无显著差异。RAKPE 组术后胆管炎发生率明显低于 OKPE 组。

结论

与 OKPE 相比,RAKPE 可能具有术中出血量少、术后输血需求减少和术后胆管炎发生率降低的优点。

证据水平

III 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验