Action Contre La Faim, Paris, France.
Action Contre La Faim, Dakar, Senegal.
Trials. 2024 Sep 19;25(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08459-1.
High-quality evidence is crucial for guiding effective humanitarian responses, yet conducting rigorous research, particularly randomised controlled trials, in humanitarian crises remains challenging. The TISA ("traitement intégré de la sous-nutrition aiguë") trial aimed to evaluate the impact of a Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) intervention on the standard national treatment of uncomplicated Severe Acute Malnutrition (SAM) in children aged 6-59 months. Implemented in two northern Senegalese regions from December 22, 2021, to February 20, 2023, the trial faced numerous challenges, which this paper explores along with the lessons learned.
The study utilised trial documentation, including field reports, meeting minutes, training plans, operational monitoring data and funding proposals, to retrace the trial timeline, identify challenges and outline implemented solutions. Contributions from all TISA key staff-current and former, field-based and headquarters-were essential for collecting and interpreting information. Challenges were categorised as internal (within the TISA consortium) or external (broader contextual issues).
The TISA trial, executed by a consortium of academic, operational, and community stakeholders, enrolled over 2000 children with uncomplicated SAM across 86 treatment posts in a 28,000 km area. The control group received standard outpatient SAM care, while the intervention group also received a WASH kit and hygiene promotion. Initially planned to start in April 2019 for 12 months, the trial faced a 30-month delay and was extended to 27 months due to challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic, national strikes, health system integration issues and weather-related disruptions. Internal challenges included logistics, staffing, data management, funding and aligning diverse stakeholder priorities.
Despite these obstacles, the trial concluded successfully, underscoring the importance of tailored monitoring, open communication, transparency and community involvement. Producing high-quality evidence in humanitarian contexts demands extensive preparation and strong coordination among local and international researchers, practitioners, communities, decision-makers and funders from the study's inception.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04667767 .
高质量的证据对于指导有效的人道主义应对至关重要,但在人道主义危机中进行严格的研究,特别是随机对照试验,仍然具有挑战性。TISA(“急性营养不良综合治疗”)试验旨在评估水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)干预措施对 6-59 个月大的无并发症严重急性营养不良(SAM)儿童国家标准治疗的影响。该试验于 2021 年 12 月 22 日至 2023 年 2 月 20 日在塞内加尔北部的两个地区实施,面临诸多挑战,本文将探讨这些挑战以及从中吸取的经验教训。
本研究利用试验文件,包括现场报告、会议记录、培训计划、运营监测数据和供资提案,追溯试验时间线、确定挑战并概述实施的解决方案。TISA 的所有关键工作人员——现任和前任、实地和总部工作人员——都为收集和解释信息做出了贡献。挑战分为内部(TISA 联盟内部)和外部(更广泛的背景问题)。
TISA 试验由学术、运营和社区利益攸关方组成的联盟执行,在 28000 平方公里的地区内,86 个治疗点共招募了 2000 多名无并发症 SAM 儿童。对照组接受标准的门诊 SAM 护理,而干预组还接受了 WASH 工具包和卫生促进。该试验原计划于 2019 年 4 月开始,为期 12 个月,但由于 COVID-19 大流行、全国性罢工、卫生系统整合问题和与天气有关的干扰等挑战,试验推迟了 30 个月,延长至 27 个月。内部挑战包括后勤、人员配置、数据管理、供资和协调不同利益攸关方的优先事项。
尽管面临这些障碍,试验仍成功完成,这凸显了量身定制监测、开放沟通、透明度和社区参与的重要性。在人道主义背景下产生高质量的证据需要在研究的一开始就需要当地和国际研究人员、从业人员、社区、决策者和供资者进行广泛的准备和强有力的协调。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04667767。