Suppr超能文献

利用联想学习评估鸡的积极体验。

Assessment of positive experiences using associative learning in chickens.

作者信息

Šemrov Manja Zupan, Terčič Dušan, Gobbo Elena

机构信息

Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Domžale, Slovenia, 1230.

Department of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Domžale, Slovenia, 1230.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2024 Dec;103(12):104282. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104282. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

Abstract

To determine whether differences in positive experiences can influence associative learning ability, 2 tasks were conducted with 90 laying hens at the peak of the laying period. The selected hens were reared in a larger flock under the same housing conditions without perches, so they had the same rearing experiences and were moved to either enriched cages or to the floor system at 16 wk of age. They belonged to 3 breeds (Slovenian barred hen: Ba; brown hen: Br; silver hen, S), with 30 hens per breed. The predictor signal, the sound of a clicker, with a 3-second delayed reinforcer (commercial layer feed) was used to mark the desired behaviour (pecking for feed). Hens that associated feed with a clicker (85.06%) were taught 2 tasks, the colour discrimination task (CD) and the target following task (TF). In the CD, the hens had to discriminate between yellow, red and blue colors and peck at a yellow magnet only. In the TF, the desired behaviour was to follow a target, a purple ball on a stick, from 1 perch to another and peck it at the end of the perch. The main results of the hens associating the signal with feed were that the Ba hens learned faster than the S hens (P = 0.006) and required fewer clicker sounds than the Br hens in the CD (P = 0.003). Floor hens that completed CD or TF or both took less time to complete the task (CD, P = 0.03, TF, P = 0.06; both tasks, P = 0.02) or with fewer clicker sounds (CD task; P = 0.02) than cage hens. Although these results suggest that Ba hens and floor hens showed better associate learning performance, probably because they perceived their environment as more rewarding and thus potentially more positive, caution is needed in interpretation considering social experiences and that the ability to perch and the ability to move quickly on a perch can be confounded in TF and both tasks can be confounded with foraging ability.

摘要

为了确定积极体验的差异是否会影响联想学习能力,在产蛋高峰期对90只蛋鸡进行了两项任务。所选的母鸡在相同的无栖木饲养条件下,以较大的鸡群饲养,因此它们有相同的饲养经历,并在16周龄时被转移到丰富笼舍或地面系统中。它们属于3个品种(斯洛文尼亚 barred 母鸡:Ba;棕色母鸡:Br;银色母鸡:S),每个品种有30只母鸡。预测信号是点击器的声音,带有3秒延迟强化物(商品蛋鸡饲料),用于标记期望行为(啄食饲料)。将饲料与点击器关联的母鸡(85.06%)被教授两项任务,颜色辨别任务(CD)和目标跟随任务(TF)。在CD任务中,母鸡必须区分黄色、红色和蓝色,并只啄黄色磁铁。在TF任务中,期望行为是跟随一个目标,一根棍子上的紫色球,从一个栖木移动到另一个栖木,并在栖木末端啄它。母鸡将信号与饲料关联的主要结果是,Ba母鸡比S母鸡学习得更快(P = 0.006),并且在CD任务中比Br母鸡需要更少的点击器声音(P = 0.003)。完成CD或TF或两项任务的地面母鸡完成任务所需的时间更少(CD任务,P = 0.03;TF任务,P = 0.06;两项任务,P = 0.02),或者比笼养母鸡使用更少的点击器声音(CD任务,P = 0.02)。尽管这些结果表明Ba母鸡和地面母鸡表现出更好的联想学习性能,可能是因为它们认为自己的环境更有回报,因此潜在地更积极,但考虑到社会经验以及在TF任务中栖木能力和在栖木上快速移动的能力可能相互混淆,并且两项任务都可能与觅食能力混淆,在解释时需要谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5b3/11437763/499a1a5436f9/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验