• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受脊柱手术的患者期望值很高,但未得到满足。

Expectations in patients undergoing spine surgery are high and unmet.

作者信息

Grundnes Ingrid Bergerud, Alhaug Ole Kristian, Reis Joao André Barroso Pereira Roque Dos, Jakobsen Rune Bruhn

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo. Klaus Torgårds vei 3, PO Box 1078, Blindern, 0372 Oslo, Norway.

Orthopedic Department, Akershus University hospital, PO Box 1000, N-1478 Loerenskog, Norway; Innlandet Hospital Trust, The Research Center for Age-related Functional Decline and Disease, PO Box 68, N2313 Ottestad, Norway.

出版信息

Spine J. 2024 Dec;24(12):2224-2231. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.004. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.004
PMID:39303830
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Defining success in spine surgery lacks a standardized approach, and all existing concepts are based on registrations after surgery.

PURPOSE

To examine patients' expectations before spine surgery assessed by a modified Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). The authors asked: how do the expectations align with actual outcomes and can a patient's individual expectations be used as a success criterion in itself?

STUDY DESIGN /SETTING: Prospective single-center study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients scheduled for spine surgery at Akershus University Hospital (AHUS) were included in the study. They underwent 1 of 3 procedures: decompression for spinal stenosis, disc removal for lumbar disc herniation, or spinal fusion for degenerative disc disease.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Modified and standard version of ODI and NRS (back and leg pain).

METHODS

Preoperatively, the patients were given a modified ODI and NRS questionnaire in which they were asked to register the minimum acceptable functional impairment and pain they anticipated to have postsurgery. The patients' expectations were compared with 3-and 12-month follow-up data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) with ODI, NRS and Global Perceived Effect (GPE) scale. We used simple descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients completed the preop questionnaire. Of these, 65 responded to the 3-month follow-up and 53 at 12-month follow-up. The mean (95%CI) ODI before surgery was 38.3 (34.2-42.3), the mean (95% CI) preoperative NRS back pain was 6.34 (5.81-6.88), and leg pain was 6.67 (6.08-7.26). The patients expected a mean (95% CI) ODI of 10.5 (7.5-13.5), mean (95%CI) NRS back pain of 2.5 (2.1-3.0), and NRS leg pain of 1.8 (1.5-2.2). The actual clinical outcome after 12 months were a mean (95% CI) ODI of 21.7 (17.0-26.5), NRS back pain of 3.4 (2.8-4.1), and leg pain of 2.8 (2.0-3.5). Only 12 (30.8%) patients achieved their expected ODI, while 26 (65.0%) classified themselves as significantly better according to GPE.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients seem to have high expectations before spine surgery, and the expectations may exceed the clinical outcome. Only 30.8% had their ODI expectations met, but perceived benefit was higher. High expectations may be due to inadequate preoperative information and/or the unsuitability of ODI for capturing expectations.

摘要

背景

脊柱手术成功的定义缺乏标准化方法,所有现有概念均基于术后登记。

目的

通过改良的奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数(ODI)和数字评分量表(NRS)评估脊柱手术前患者的期望。作者提出疑问:期望与实际结果如何匹配,患者的个人期望本身能否用作成功标准?

研究设计/地点:前瞻性单中心研究。

患者样本

在阿克什胡斯大学医院(AHUS)计划进行脊柱手术的患者纳入本研究。他们接受了以下三种手术之一:腰椎管狭窄减压术、腰椎间盘突出症椎间盘切除术或退变性椎间盘疾病脊柱融合术。

结果指标

改良版和标准版ODI以及NRS(腰背痛和腿痛)。

方法

术前,患者接受改良的ODI和NRS问卷,被要求记录他们预期术后可接受的最低功能障碍和疼痛程度。将患者的期望与挪威脊柱手术登记处(NORspine)3个月和12个月随访数据中的ODI、NRS和总体感知效果(GPE)量表进行比较。我们使用了简单描述性统计。

结果

共有93名患者完成了术前问卷。其中,65名患者对3个月随访做出回应,53名患者对12个月随访做出回应。术前ODI的均值(95%CI)为38.3(34.2 - 42.3),术前NRS腰背痛均值(95%CI)为6.34(5.81 - 6.88),腿痛均值为6.67(6.08 - 7.26)。患者预期ODI均值(95%CI)为10.5(7.5 - 13.5),NRS腰背痛均值(95%CI)为2.5(2.1 - 3.0),NRS腿痛均值为1.8(1.5 - 2.2)。12个月后的实际临床结果为ODI均值(95%CI)为21.7(17.0 - 26.5),NRS腰背痛为3.4(2.8 - 4.1),腿痛为2.8(2.0 - 3.5)。只有12名(30.8%)患者达到了预期的ODI,而26名(65.0%)患者根据GPE将自己归类为明显好转。

结论

患者在脊柱手术前似乎期望较高,且期望可能超过临床结果。只有30.8%的患者达到了ODI期望,但感知到的益处更高。高期望可能是由于术前信息不足和/或ODI不适用于捕捉期望。

相似文献

1
Expectations in patients undergoing spine surgery are high and unmet.接受脊柱手术的患者期望值很高,但未得到满足。
Spine J. 2024 Dec;24(12):2224-2231. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.09.004. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.腰椎间盘突出症手术后失败和病情恶化的标准:一项基于挪威脊柱外科注册中心数据的多中心观察性研究。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Oct;26(10):2650-2659. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5185-5. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
3
A novel lumbar total joint replacement may be an improvement over fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions: a comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes at one year.一种新型腰椎全关节置换术可能优于融合术治疗退行性腰椎疾病:一年时患者报告结局的比较分析。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):829-840. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.12.001. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Impact of preoperative diagnosis on patient satisfaction following lumbar spine surgery.术前诊断对腰椎手术后患者满意度的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jun;26(6):709-715. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.SPINE16848. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
5
Prognostic factors associated with best outcomes (minimal symptom state) following fusion for lumbar degenerative conditions.与腰椎退行性疾病融合后获得最佳结果(最小症状状态)相关的预后因素。
Spine J. 2019 Feb;19(2):187-190. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.06.348. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
6
Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.腰椎手术后3个月的奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数结果不足以评估个体患者的长期体验。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Aug;25(2):170-80. doi: 10.3171/2015.11.SPINE15872. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
7
Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective national spine registry observational study.腰椎管狭窄症手术后失败和恶化的标准:一项前瞻性全国脊柱登记观察性研究。
Spine J. 2021 Sep;21(9):1489-1496. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
8
Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.微创后路经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的长期耐久性:临床及影像学随访
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011 Jul;24(5):288-96. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181f9a60a.
9
Reassessing the minimum 2-year follow-up standard after lumbar decompression surgery: a 2-month follow-up seems to be an acceptable minimum.重新评估腰椎减压手术后的最低 2 年随访标准:2 个月的随访似乎是可以接受的最低标准。
Spine J. 2024 Jul;24(7):1244-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.03.018. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
10
Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.腰椎管狭窄症的放射学严重程度与残疾、疼痛或手术结果之间存在关联吗?一项多中心观察性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):E78-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001166.

引用本文的文献

1
Full-endoscopic decompression surgery in the treatment of elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.全内镜减压手术治疗老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症患者
Front Surg. 2025 Jun 16;12:1582877. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1582877. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation for abdominal wall metastases: a retrospective study.超声引导下经皮热消融治疗腹壁转移瘤的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 1;25(1):583. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-13802-z.