• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用人工智能评估经胫骨假肢接受腔形状设计的有效性:与传统石膏绷带接受腔设计的临床比较

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape Design Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Comparison With Traditional Plaster Cast Socket Designs.

作者信息

van der Stelt Merel, Berends Bo, Papenburg Marco, Langenhuyzen Tom, Maal Thomas, Brouwers Lars, de Jong Guido, Leijendekkers Ruud

机构信息

3D Lab Radboudumc, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

3D Lab Radboudumc, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Feb;106(2):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026
PMID:39304077
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility of creating an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to enhance prosthetic socket shapes for transtibial prostheses, aiming for a less operator-dependent, standardized approach.

DESIGN

The study comprised 2 phases: first, developing an AI algorithm in a cross-sectional study to predict prosthetic socket shapes. Second, testing the AI-predicted digitally measured and standardized designed (DMSD) prosthetic socket against a manually measured and designed (MMD) prosthetic socket in a 2-week within-subject cross-sectional study.

SETTING

The study was done at the rehabilitation department of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

The AI algorithm was developed using retrospective data from 116 patients from a Dutch orthopedic company, OIM Orthopedie, and tested on 10 randomly selected participants from Papenburg Orthopedie.

INTERVENTIONS

Utilization of an AI algorithm to enhance the shape of a transtibial prosthetic socket.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The algorithm was optimized to minimize the error in the test set. Participants' socket comfort score and fitting ratings from an independent physiotherapist and prosthetist were collected.

RESULTS

Predicted prosthetic shapes deviated by 2.51 mm from the actual designs. In total, 8 of 10 DMSD and all 10 MMD-prosthetic sockets were satisfactory for home testing. Participants rated DMSD-prosthetic sockets at 7.1 ± 2.2 (n=8) and MMD-prosthetic sockets at 6.6 ± 1.2 (n=10) on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates promising results for using an AI algorithm in prosthetic socket design, but long-term effectiveness and refinement for improved comfort and fit in more deviant cases are necessary.

摘要

目的

研究创建一种人工智能(AI)算法以优化经胫骨假肢接受腔形状的可行性,旨在实现一种较少依赖操作人员的标准化方法。

设计

该研究包括两个阶段:第一,在横断面研究中开发一种AI算法以预测假肢接受腔形状。第二,在一项为期两周的受试者内横断面研究中,将AI预测的数字测量和标准化设计(DMSD)假肢接受腔与手动测量和设计(MMD)的假肢接受腔进行测试对比。

地点

该研究在荷兰奈梅亨拉德堡德大学医学中心康复科进行。

参与者

AI算法是利用荷兰一家骨科公司OIM Orthopedie的116例患者的回顾性数据开发的,并在来自帕彭堡矫形外科的10名随机选择的参与者身上进行了测试。

干预措施

利用AI算法优化经胫骨假肢接受腔的形状。

主要观察指标

对算法进行优化以最小化测试集中的误差。收集了参与者的接受腔舒适度评分以及独立物理治疗师和假肢矫形师的适配评级。

结果

预测的假肢形状与实际设计相差2.51毫米。在10个DMSD假肢接受腔中,共有8个以及所有10个MMD假肢接受腔在家用测试中令人满意。参与者对DMSD假肢接受腔的平均评分为7.1±2.2(n = 8),对MMD假肢接受腔的平均评分为6.6±1.2(n = 10)。

结论

该研究表明在假肢接受腔设计中使用AI算法有良好前景,但在更复杂的病例中,为提高舒适度和适配度,还需要长期有效性和改进。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Shape Design Using Artificial Intelligence: A Clinical Comparison With Traditional Plaster Cast Socket Designs.使用人工智能评估经胫骨假肢接受腔形状设计的有效性:与传统石膏绷带接受腔设计的临床比较
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Feb;106(2):239-246. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
How To Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.如何使用骨锚式假肢改善下肢截肢患者的患者选择
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003369.
3
Is Socket Flexion Alignment Associated With Changes in Gait Parameters in Individuals With an Above-knee Amputation and a Hip Flexion Contracture?对于膝上截肢且伴有髋关节屈曲挛缩的个体,残肢屈曲对线与步态参数变化是否相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):535-546. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003288. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes.当前经胫假肢接受腔设计效果的系统评价——第1部分:定性结果
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(5):491-508. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0183.
5
Adjustable prosthetic sockets: a systematic review of industrial and research design characteristics and their justifications.可调节义肢接受腔:工业和研究设计特点及其合理性的系统评价。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Nov 6;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01270-0.
6
Does Transhumeral Osseointegration After Amputation Improve Patient-reported Outcomes and Prosthesis Use?截肢后经肱骨骨整合是否能改善患者报告的结局及假肢使用情况?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003420.
7
Qualitative investigation into the functional problems of transtibial prostheses when amputees perform agricultural work.对截肢者从事农业工作时经胫骨假肢功能问题的定性调查。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2024 Dec 11;49(4):378-387. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000387.
8
Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature.经胫骨假肢悬吊系统:文献系统综述
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2014 Jan;29(1):87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
9
Artificial intelligence for diagnosing exudative age-related macular degeneration.人工智能在渗出性年龄相关性黄斑变性诊断中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 17;10(10):CD015522. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015522.pub2.
10
Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs--Part 2: Quantitative outcomes.当前经胫假肢接受腔设计效果的系统评价——第2部分:定量结果。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(5):509-26. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0184.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence-Generated Sockets for Transtibial Prosthetic Limbs Compared With Conventional Computer-Aided Designs: A Multiple-Methods Study From the Patient's Perspective.与传统计算机辅助设计相比,基于证据生成的经胫骨假肢接受腔:一项从患者角度出发的多方法研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Aug 21;12:e69962. doi: 10.2196/69962.