Radiation-emitting metallic stent for unresectable Bismuth type III or IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) have been recommended for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction, while radiation-emitting metallic stents (REMSs) loaded with 125 I seeds have recently been approved to provide longer patency and overall survival in malignant biliary tract obstruction. This trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REMS plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (REMS-HAIC) versus SEMS plus HAIC (SEMS-HAIC) for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA between March 2021 and January 2023. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either REMS-HAIC or SEMS-HAIC using permuted block randomization, with a block size of six. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were time to symptomatic progression (TTSP), stent patency, relief of jaundice, quality of life, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included in the intent-to-treat population, with 63 in each group. The median OS was 10.2 months versus 6.7 months ( P =0.002). The median TTSP was 8.6 months versus 5.4 months ( P =0.003). The median stent patency was longer in the REMS-HAIC group than in the SEMS-HAIC group ( P =0.001). The REMS-HAIC group showed better improvement in physical functioning scale ( P <0.05) and fatigue symptoms ( P <0.05) when compared to the SEMS-HAIC group. No significant differences were observed in relief of jaundice (85.7% vs. 84.1%; P =0.803) or the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (9.8% vs. 11.9%; P =0.721).

CONCLUSION

REMS plus HAIC showed better OS, TTSP, and stent patency compared with SEMS plus HAIC in patients with unresectable Bismuth type III or IV pCCA with an acceptable safety profile.