Suppr超能文献

长达24周的全身型重症肌无力患者中齐卢可泮疗效的维持:一项模型辅助分析

Maintenance of zilucoplan efficacy in patients with generalised myasthenia gravis up to 24 weeks: a model-informed analysis.

作者信息

de la Borderie Guillemette, Chimits Damien, Boroojerdi Babak, Brock Melissa, Duda Petra W, Grimson Fiona, Mahoney Paul, Strimenopoulou Foteini, Cutter Gary, Aban Inmaculada, Brauner Susanna, Petersson Malin, Howard James F, Bennett Nathan

机构信息

UCB, 420 rue d'Estienne d'Orves, Colombes 92700, France.

UCB, Colombes, France.

出版信息

Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Sep 21;17:17562864241279125. doi: 10.1177/17562864241279125. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical efficacy of zilucoplan has been demonstrated in a 12-week, placebo-controlled, phase III study in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis (gMG). However, placebo-controlled zilucoplan data past 12 weeks are not available.

OBJECTIVES

Predict the treatment effect of zilucoplan versus control (placebo or standard of care) in patients with gMG up to 24 weeks.

DESIGN

A model-informed analysis (MIA) within a Bayesian framework.

METHODS

Part 1 of the MIA comprised a control meta-regression using aggregate data on control response over time from randomised studies and a national myasthenia gravis (MG) registry. In Part 2, a combined Bayesian analysis of individual patient-level data from the phase II (NCT03315130), RAISE (NCT04115293) and RAISE-XT (NCT04225871) studies of zilucoplan was conducted using posterior distributions from Part 1 as informative priors. Population mean treatment effect in the change from baseline (CFB) at week 24 in MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and quantitative MG (QMG) scores for zilucoplan versus control were assessed.

RESULTS

At week 24, the predicted mean CFB in MG-ADL score was -4.55 (95% credible interval: -6.04, -3.13) with zilucoplan versus -2.00 (-3.35, -0.64) with control (difference: -2.55 [-3.76, -1.40]). The probability of a favourable treatment effect as measured by MG-ADL score at week 24 with zilucoplan versus control was >99.9%. There was an 82.8% probability that the difference in the predicted mean CFB in MG-ADL score at week 24 was greater than the clinically meaningful threshold (⩾2.0-point improvement). Comparable results were observed with QMG.

CONCLUSION

This MIA demonstrates the maintenance of efficacy with zilucoplan versus control up to 24 weeks. Through combining real-world evidence with data from randomised studies, this novel method to estimate long-term treatment efficacy facilitated reduced exposure to placebo in the phase III RAISE study. This methodology could be used to reduce the length of future placebo-controlled studies.

摘要

背景

在一项针对乙酰胆碱受体自身抗体阳性的全身型重症肌无力(gMG)患者的为期12周的安慰剂对照III期研究中,已证明zilucoplan的临床疗效。然而,尚无超过12周的安慰剂对照zilucoplan数据。

目的

预测zilucoplan与对照(安慰剂或标准治疗)相比,在长达24周的gMG患者中的治疗效果。

设计

贝叶斯框架下的模型 informed 分析(MIA)。

方法

MIA的第1部分包括一项对照meta回归,使用来自随机研究和全国重症肌无力(MG)登记处的对照随时间变化的汇总数据。在第2部分中,使用第1部分的后验分布作为信息先验,对zilucoplan的II期(NCT03315130)、RAISE(NCT04115293)和RAISE-XT(NCT04225871)研究的个体患者水平数据进行联合贝叶斯分析。评估了zilucoplan与对照相比,在第24周时重症肌无力日常生活活动(MG-ADL)和定量重症肌无力(QMG)评分从基线变化(CFB)的总体平均治疗效果。

结果

在第24周时,zilucoplan组MG-ADL评分的预测平均CFB为-4.55(95%可信区间:-6.04,-3.13),而对照组为-2.00(-3.35,-0.64)(差异:-2.55[-3.76,-1.40])。在第24周时,以MG-ADL评分衡量,zilucoplan与对照相比具有良好治疗效果的概率>99.9%。第24周时MG-ADL评分预测平均CFB差异大于临床有意义阈值(改善⩾2.0分)的概率为82.8%。QMG也观察到了类似结果。

结论

这项MIA证明了zilucoplan与对照相比,长达24周的疗效维持情况。通过将真实世界证据与随机研究数据相结合,这种估计长期治疗疗效的新方法有助于在III期RAISE研究中减少安慰剂暴露。该方法可用于缩短未来安慰剂对照研究的时长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac41/11418339/b9c5df9403ba/10.1177_17562864241279125-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验