高韧性和低韧性人群的执行功能比较。
Comparison of executive functions in people with high and low resilience.
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
出版信息
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Nov;179:238-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.09.016. Epub 2024 Sep 14.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the present study was to compare executive functions in people with high and low resilience.
METHODS
Based on the results of a structured clinical interview and Connor- Davidson resilience Scale (CD-RISC), a total of 140 adults were assigned to high resilience (n = 70) and low resilience (n = 70) groups. Working memory, inhibition and cognitive flexibility were assessed by N-Back, Go/No-Go and Wisconsin Card Sorting task, respectively.
RESULT
The results showed that individuals with high resilience compared to individuals with low resilience scored significantly higher on inhibition and cognitive flexibility, but there were no significant differences on working memory.
CONCLUSION
The current findings suggest a role of high-level cognitive processes in resilience, which in turn may contribute to mental health. Also, the results of this research may be important in the design of therapeutic interventions based on executive functions.
背景
本研究旨在比较高韧性和低韧性人群的执行功能。
方法
根据结构临床访谈和康纳-戴维森韧性量表（CD-RISC）的结果，共有 140 名成年人被分为高韧性组（n=70）和低韧性组（n=70）。工作记忆、抑制和认知灵活性分别通过 N-Back、Go/No-Go 和威斯康星卡片分类任务进行评估。
结果
结果表明，与低韧性个体相比，高韧性个体在抑制和认知灵活性方面的得分显著更高，而在工作记忆方面没有显著差异。
结论
目前的研究结果表明，高水平认知过程在韧性中起着重要作用，这反过来可能有助于心理健康。此外，本研究的结果对于基于执行功能的治疗干预措施的设计可能很重要。
Zotero 插件