Duval J
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1985 Jul;16 Suppl A:137-49. doi: 10.1093/jac/16.suppl_a.137.
Within the framework of this symposium, it is not feasible to present an exhaustive description of the present state of knowledge regarding the sensitivity and resistance of bacterial species to macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramins (MLS). This paper is limited to a description of the evolution of different types of resistance in the light of decisive factors described in previous papers, in order to deduce, if at all possible, trends in future strategy in therapeutics. Only acquired resistance lends itself to epidemiological study, in contrast to natural resistance which is, by definition, characteristic of a species or a genus, and not liable to change. Three groups will therefore be studied in turn: Staphylococcus aureus, streptococci and Bacteroides fragilis. There is as yet insufficient accumulated data to draw conclusions regarding the epidemiology and evolution of MLSB resistance observed in Clostridium perfringens and Corynebacterium diphtheriae, or regarding the high-level resistance to erythromycin due to enzymatic inactivation recently described in Escherichia coli.
在本次研讨会的框架内,详尽描述细菌对大环内酯类、林可酰胺类及链阳菌素(MLS)的敏感性和耐药性的当前知识状态是不可行的。本文限于根据先前论文中描述的决定性因素,阐述不同类型耐药性的演变情况,以便尽可能推断治疗学未来策略的趋势。与天然耐药性不同,获得性耐药性适合进行流行病学研究。天然耐药性根据定义是一个物种或属的特征,不易改变。因此,将依次研究三组细菌:金黄色葡萄球菌、链球菌和脆弱拟杆菌。目前尚无足够的累积数据来得出关于在产气荚膜梭菌和白喉棒状杆菌中观察到的MLSB耐药性的流行病学和演变情况的结论,也无法得出关于最近在大肠杆菌中描述的由于酶失活导致的对红霉素的高水平耐药性的结论。