Subillaga Oswaldo E, Lynch Kenneth, Haas-Rodriguez Ashlie, Harrington David, Miner Thomas
Department of Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Brown University, Providence, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 26;16(8):e67829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67829. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Introduction Educators continue to evaluate ways to assess resident performance in conjunction with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) general surgery milestones. We investigated whether the rate of medication errors could reflect general surgery resident competency. We hypothesized that the identification of increased medication errors made by general surgery residents could be a potential screening tool to identify residents who are academically at risk prior to their formal biannual milestone evaluation by the clinical competency committee. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of medication ordering errors against ACGME core competency scores over four years in a general surgery residency program at an academic, university-affiliated, level 1 trauma center in the Northeastern United States. Results We identified 95 general surgery residents who inputted 1,164,663 medication orders during the four years studied. There were 1,214 (0.1%) errors identified. Of those, 1,146 (94.4%) were level 3 errors, and 68 (5.6%) were level 4 errors This represents an error rate of 1.04 errors per 1,000 medication orders. There was a statistically significant decrease in the error rate as the post-graduate year (PGY) level increased (p=0.005). However, there was no correlation between the error rate and individual ACGME milestone competency scores by PGY level. Conclusions We explored whether medication errors may be an early measurement of worsening resident performance as demonstrated by a decrease in ACGME core competency scores. However, the rate of errors did not correlate consistently with these measures. This may underscore that medication errors measure an aspect of resident performance that we do not capture with our current assessments.
引言 教育工作者继续与毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)普通外科里程碑相结合,评估评估住院医师表现的方法。我们调查了用药错误率是否能反映普通外科住院医师的能力。我们假设,识别普通外科住院医师增加的用药错误可能是一种潜在的筛查工具,用于在临床能力委员会进行正式的半年一次里程碑评估之前,识别有学业风险的住院医师。方法 这是一项回顾性队列研究,比较了美国东北部一所学术性、大学附属的一级创伤中心普通外科住院医师培训项目四年中用药医嘱错误率与ACGME核心能力得分。结果 我们确定了95名普通外科住院医师,他们在研究的四年中输入了1,164,663条用药医嘱。共识别出1,214例(0.1%)错误。其中,1,146例(94.4%)为3级错误,68例(5.6%)为4级错误。这代表每1000条用药医嘱的错误率为1.04例。随着研究生年级(PGY)水平的提高,错误率有统计学意义的下降(p=0.005)。然而,错误率与PGY水平的个体ACGME里程碑能力得分之间没有相关性。结论 我们探讨了用药错误是否可能是住院医师表现恶化的早期指标,如ACGME核心能力得分下降所示。然而,错误率与这些指标并不一致相关。这可能强调用药错误衡量了我们目前评估中未涵盖的住院医师表现的一个方面。