Kenyon Kenneth, McLaurin Eugene B, Silverstein Steven M, Meyer John C, Anderson Erik, Patel Ravi H, Gomes Paul J, Reilly Erin, Vantipalli Srilatha, Cheung Matthew W, Goldstein Michael H
Andover Eye Associates, Andover, MA, USA.
Total Eye Care, P.A., Memphis, TN, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 21;18:2671-2684. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S476419. eCollection 2024.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone intracanalicular insert (DEX) for treatment of allergic conjunctivitis (AC).
In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, adults (≥18 years) with AC were randomized 1:1 to DEX or placebo insert (PBO) placed bilaterally. Subjects underwent repetitive conjunctival allergen challenges (CAC) across 30 days and were assessed for changes in AC signs and symptoms. The primary endpoint was ocular itching score at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC at Day 8 (7 days post-insertion). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04050865).
Ninety-six subjects were randomized (n=48 DEX, n=48 PBO). Compared to PBO, there were statistically significant treatment differences favoring DEX for the primary endpoint of mean ocular itching score at Day 8 (-0.86, -0.98, -0.96 at 3, 5, and 7 minutes post-CAC respectively; <0.0001 for all). Treatment differences favored DEX for all 24 time points across 6 visits and were statistically significant (<0.05) except for the first post-insertion (Day 7, 3 minutes). For the 18 time points at which conjunctival redness was assessed, DEX had lower scores than PBO (<0.05 for all). The most common ocular adverse events (AEs) in DEX subjects were eye discharge and irritation. No serious AEs, elevated intraocular pressure, dacryocanaliculitis, or use of rescue medications were reported.
Results of this study support the potential use of dexamethasone insert as a physician-administered, preservative-free treatment for AC, with significant improvements in ocular itching and conjunctival redness compared with placebo. The dexamethasone insert was generally safe with a favorable safety profile.
评估地塞米松泪小管插入剂(DEX)治疗过敏性结膜炎(AC)的有效性和安全性。
在这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期研究中,患有AC的成年人(≥18岁)被1:1随机分为双侧植入DEX或安慰剂插入剂(PBO)。受试者在30天内接受重复的结膜过敏原激发试验(CAC),并评估AC体征和症状的变化。主要终点是第8天(插入后7天)CAC后3、5和7分钟时的眼部瘙痒评分。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04050865)上注册。
96名受试者被随机分组(n = 48 DEX,n = 48 PBO)。与PBO相比,在第8天平均眼部瘙痒评分的主要终点方面,有利于DEX的治疗差异具有统计学意义(CAC后3、5和7分钟时分别为-0.86、-0.98、-0.96;均<0.0001)。在6次就诊的所有24个时间点,治疗差异均有利于DEX,除了插入后第一个时间点(第7天,3分钟)外,差异均具有统计学意义(<0.05)。在评估结膜充血的18个时间点,DEX的评分低于PBO(均<0.05)。DEX组受试者最常见的眼部不良事件(AE)是眼部分泌物和刺激。未报告严重AE、眼压升高、泪小管炎或使用急救药物。
本研究结果支持地塞米松插入剂作为医生给药的、无防腐剂的AC治疗方法的潜在用途,与安慰剂相比,眼部瘙痒和结膜充血有显著改善。地塞米松插入剂总体安全,安全性良好。