• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"We Need to Know These Things": Use Cases for Combined Social and Clinical Data Among Primary Care-Based Clinical and Social Care Providers.“我们需要了解这些事情”:初级保健临床和社会保健提供者联合使用社会和临床数据的用例。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241286306. doi: 10.1177/21501319241286306.
2
"Attitude is the fifth delay": perspectives of obstetric near-miss survivors and health care professionals on continuity and coordination of maternal care.“态度是第五种延误”:产科近距 misses 幸存者和医疗保健专业人员对孕产妇保健连续性和协调性的看法。 (注:“near-miss”直译为“近距 misses”,可能是特定医学术语,这里保留原文形式,你可根据实际医学含义进行调整)
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12341-4.
3
Disconnected relationships between primary care and community-based health and social services and system navigation for older adults: a qualitative descriptive study.初级保健与社区卫生和社会服务以及老年人系统导航之间脱节的关系:一项定性描述性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Apr 23;21(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01143-8.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Assessment of older persons with multimorbidity in Norwegian primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences and preferences in fostering continuity of care.挪威初级保健中患有多种疾病的老年人评估:一项关于医疗保健专业人员在促进连续性护理方面的经验和偏好的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12185-4.
6
A qualitative analysis of interprofessional healthcare team members' perceptions of patient barriers to healthcare engagement.对跨专业医疗团队成员对患者参与医疗保健的障碍认知的定性分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 20;16:493. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1751-5.
7
Improving the integration of care for trans adults: ICTA a mixed-methods study.改善跨性别成人的护理整合:ICTA 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(28):1-217. doi: 10.3310/EWTA4502.
8
Factors Affecting the Integration of Dental Services Into Health and Social Care for People With Complex Needs.影响为有复杂需求者将牙科服务纳入健康与社会照护体系的因素。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70243. doi: 10.1111/hex.70243.
9
Scrambling for access: availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality of healthcare for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in South Africa.争夺医疗机会:南非女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者获得医疗保健的可及性、可利用性、可接受性及质量
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2017 May 30;17(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12914-017-0124-4.
10
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.

引用本文的文献

1
"The start of something that I hope could be greater": Health information technology tools for social care.“我希望可能会更伟大之事的开端”:用于社会护理的健康信息技术工具
SSM Qual Res Health. 2025 Jun;7. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100544. Epub 2025 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving Maternal Health and Birth Outcomes Through FreshRx: A Food-Is-Medicine Intervention.通过 FreshRx 改善孕产妇健康和生育结局:一项食物即药物干预。
Am J Health Promot. 2025 Jan;39(1):114-121. doi: 10.1177/08901171241249278. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
Effect of a Legal Clinic Program Within an Urban Primary Health Care Center on Social Determinants of Health: A Program Evaluation.城市基层医疗中心法律诊所项目对健康社会决定因素的影响:项目评估。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241245849. doi: 10.1177/21501319241245849.
3
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Unmet Social Needs and Clinical Outcomes Among Adults with Diabetes.一项改善成年糖尿病患者未满足的社会需求及临床结局的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Oct;39(13):2415-2424. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08708-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Addressing Social Needs in Clinical Settings: Implementation and Impact on Health Care Utilization, Costs, and Integration of Care.解决临床环境中的社会需求:实施情况以及对医疗保健利用、成本和医疗整合的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):443-464. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-061022-050026. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
5
Effect of a Social Care Intervention on Health Care Experiences of Caregivers of Hospitalized Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社会护理干预对住院儿童照顾者医疗体验的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2023 Dec 1;177(12):1266-1275. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.4596.
6
The Design and Impact of a Clinic-Based Community Program on Food Insecurity, Healthy Eating Behaviors, and Mood.基于诊所的社区项目在食物不安全、健康饮食行为和情绪方面的设计和影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Oct 10;15(20):4316. doi: 10.3390/nu15204316.
7
Integrating Social Care into Healthcare: A Review on Applying the Social Determinants of Health in Clinical Settings.将社会关怀融入医疗保健:临床环境中应用健康的社会决定因素的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 2;20(19):6873. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196873.
8
Social Navigation for Adolescent Emergency Department Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.青少年急诊科患者的社会导航:一项随机临床试验。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Feb;74(2):292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.08.030. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
9
Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Intervention Among Low-Income and Minoritized Patients With Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者主导的干预措施对低收入和少数族裔癌症患者的影响:一项随机临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 10;42(5):518-528. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00309. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
10
Patient-Reported Social Risks and Clinician Decision Making: Results of a Clinician Survey in Primary Care Community Health Centers.患者报告的社会风险与临床医生决策:基层医疗社区卫生中心临床医生调查结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2023 Mar-Apr;21(2):143-150. doi: 10.1370/afm.2953.

“我们需要了解这些事情”:初级保健临床和社会保健提供者联合使用社会和临床数据的用例。

"We Need to Know These Things": Use Cases for Combined Social and Clinical Data Among Primary Care-Based Clinical and Social Care Providers.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine and Social Interventions Research and Evaluation Network, Center for Health and Community, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

2-1-1 San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241286306. doi: 10.1177/21501319241286306.

DOI:10.1177/21501319241286306
PMID:39331388
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526201/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Primary care organizations are increasingly collecting data on patients' social risks, bringing forth an unprecedented opportunity to present combined health and social data that clinical and social care providers could leverage to improve patient care and outcomes. Little is known, however, about how these data could be used and what combinations of specific data elements are most helpful. We explored how primary care staff who provide clinical or social care services view potential benefits of and use cases for combined patient-level clinical and social data.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews or focus groups with 39 social and clinical care providers representing 6 healthcare organizations in San Diego County, California. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a deductive thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Overall, both clinical and social care providers noted the value of access to both types of data. Participants highlighted 3 benefits from integrating social and clinical data. The data could: (1) offer providers a more holistic view of patients' circumstances; (2) strengthen their ability to tailor care to patients' medical and social conditions concurrently; and (3) enhance coordination across care team members. Interviewees cited specific examples of ways social and clinical data could be paired to improve care.

CONCLUSIONS

Social and clinical care providers alike envisioned multiple uses and benefits of accessing combined individual-level clinical and social data, highlighting the potential for practice and policy innovations to facilitate access and uptake of combined data. Future research should focus on ways to increase accessibility of cross-sector data and evaluate the impact of care informed by combined data on patient social and health outcomes.

摘要

介绍/目的:初级保健组织越来越多地收集患者社会风险数据,这为提供综合健康和社会数据提供了前所未有的机会,临床和社会护理提供者可以利用这些数据来改善患者的护理和结果。然而,人们对这些数据如何被使用以及哪些特定数据元素的组合最有帮助知之甚少。我们探讨了提供临床或社会护理服务的初级保健人员如何看待综合患者层面的临床和社会数据的潜在益处和用例。

方法

我们对来自加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥县 6 家医疗保健组织的 39 名社会和临床护理提供者进行了定性访谈或焦点小组讨论。访谈记录进行了转录,并使用演绎主题分析方法进行了分析。

结果

总体而言,临床和社会护理提供者都注意到了访问这两种类型数据的价值。参与者强调了整合社会和临床数据的 3 个好处。这些数据可以:(1)为提供者提供患者情况的更全面视图;(2)增强他们同时根据患者的医疗和社会状况调整护理的能力;(3)增强护理团队成员之间的协调。受访者列举了将社会和临床数据结合起来改善护理的具体示例。

结论

社会和临床护理提供者都设想了访问综合个体层面临床和社会数据的多种用途和益处,这突显了促进综合数据的获取和使用的实践和政策创新的潜力。未来的研究应侧重于增加跨部门数据的可访问性,并评估通过综合数据提供的护理对患者社会和健康结果的影响。