Barbetti Margherita, Sgoifo Andrea, Carnevali Luca
Stress Physiology Lab, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Stress Physiology Lab, Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Physiol Behav. 2024 Dec 1;287:114702. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2024.114702. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
In humans, sex disparities exist in the prevalence of social stress-related disorders, yet our understanding of the predisposing factors and underlying mechanisms is still elusive. Also at the preclinical level, the investigation of sex differences in social stress responses is limited. In this study, adult male and female wild-type Groningen rats were repeatedly exposed to witness social defeat stress (WS) to assess sex-specific behavioral, neuroendocrine, and cardiac responses to the same social stress paradigm. Male and female rats bore witness to an aggressive social defeat episode between two males for nine consecutive days or were exposed to a control (CTR) procedure. Stress-related parameters were assessed in correspondence to the first and last WS/CTR exposure and also during subsequent exposure to the stress context alone in the absence of social defeat. During WS, rats of both sexes displayed larger amounts of burying behavior and smaller amounts of rearing and grooming behaviors, but with a greater extent in female witnesses. Cardiac autonomic responses to WS were similar between the sexes, yet only females displayed higher plasma corticosterone levels after the first WS exposure compared to CTRs, and had a larger corticosterone increase than male witnesses upon repeated WS. Exposure to the stress context alone (i.e., without the presence of the aggressive resident rat) elicited greater amount of burying behavior and more pronounced and persistent tachycardic responses in females than males with a history of WS. Our findings suggest sex-disparities in the response of adult rats to WS at multiple behavioral, cardiac, and neuroendocrine levels, highlighting the utility of this social stress paradigm for investigating predisposing factors and pathophysiological mechanisms underlying sex-specific vulnerabilities to stress-related pathologies.
在人类中,与社会应激相关的疾病患病率存在性别差异,但我们对其易感因素和潜在机制仍知之甚少。在临床前水平,对社会应激反应中性别差异的研究也很有限。在本研究中,成年雄性和雌性野生型格罗宁根大鼠被反复暴露于目睹社会挫败应激(WS)中,以评估对相同社会应激范式的性别特异性行为、神经内分泌和心脏反应。雄性和雌性大鼠连续九天目睹两只雄性之间的攻击性社会挫败事件,或接受对照(CTR)程序。在第一次和最后一次WS/CTR暴露时以及随后仅在无社会挫败的应激环境中暴露时,对应激相关参数进行评估。在WS期间,两性大鼠均表现出更多的埋土行为和更少的直立和梳理行为,但雌性目睹者的程度更大。两性对WS的心脏自主神经反应相似,但与CTR组相比,只有雌性在第一次WS暴露后血浆皮质酮水平更高,并且在重复WS时皮质酮的增加幅度比雄性目睹者更大。仅暴露于应激环境(即没有攻击性常驻大鼠在场)时,有WS经历的雌性大鼠比雄性大鼠表现出更多的埋土行为以及更明显和持续的心动过速反应。我们的研究结果表明,成年大鼠对WS的反应在行为、心脏和神经内分泌多个水平上存在性别差异,突出了这种社会应激范式在研究应激相关疾病性别特异性易感性的易感因素和病理生理机制方面的实用性。