Park Si-Min, Rodriguez Joe, Zhang Zidong, Miyata Shin
Department of Pediatric Surgery, SSM Health Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital, 1465 S. Grand Blvd. St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
Advanced HEAlth Data (AHEAD) Institute, Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 S Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
J Pediatr Surg. 2025 Feb;60(2):161892. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161892. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
Hemorrhagic shock secondary to trauma is a leading cause of pediatric mortality in the United States. Timely intervention is crucial to prevent many of these deaths. Children and adults exhibit distinct responses to trauma due to varying blood volume ratios and injury patterns. Pediatric patients with hypotension face a heightened risk of shock, demanding a more assertive resuscitation.
This study is a review of the literature on LTOWB transfusion in pediatric trauma. We conducted electronic database searches until December 2022, using keywords related to LTOWB and pediatric trauma resuscitation. Randomized/non-randomized, retrospective/prospective studies were considered, assessing serological safety, adverse reactions, clinical outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.
Six articles were ultimately reviewed. No adverse reactions related to hemolysis biomarkers were observed. Clinical outcomes exhibited no significant differences in mortality, hospital, or ventilator days between LTOWB and component therapy (CT). However, LTOWB transfusion resulted in faster resolution of base deficit, lower INR, and reduced requirement for additive plasma and platelet transfusions. In military and massive transfusion cases, LTOWB was associated with decreased mortality and lower transfusion volumes. One article suggested potential economic advantages.
LTOWB transfusion appears to be a promising option for pediatric trauma resuscitation, offering benefits in rapid administration and component balance. While some studies indicate potential advantages in clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness, the current evidence is limited and requires further investigation. Future research should focus on large-scale studies to validate these findings, especially concerning economic benefits, and develop standardized protocols for LTOWB use in pediatric settings.
Treatment Study, LEVEL III.
创伤继发的失血性休克是美国儿童死亡的主要原因。及时干预对于预防许多此类死亡至关重要。由于血容量比和损伤模式不同,儿童和成人对创伤表现出不同的反应。低血压的儿科患者面临更高的休克风险,需要更积极的复苏。
本研究是对儿科创伤中低体温、低血压、酸中毒(LTOWB)输血文献的综述。我们进行了电子数据库检索,直至2022年12月,使用与LTOWB和儿科创伤复苏相关的关键词。纳入随机/非随机、回顾性/前瞻性研究,评估血清学安全性、不良反应、临床结局和成本效益。
最终审查了6篇文章。未观察到与溶血生物标志物相关的不良反应。在死亡率、住院天数或呼吸机使用天数方面,LTOWB与成分输血(CT)之间的临床结局无显著差异。然而,LTOWB输血可使碱缺失更快得到纠正,国际标准化比值(INR)降低,补充血浆和血小板输血的需求减少。在军事和大量输血病例中,LTOWB与死亡率降低和输血量减少相关。一篇文章提出了潜在的经济优势。
LTOWB输血似乎是儿科创伤复苏的一个有前景的选择,在快速输注和成分平衡方面具有优势。虽然一些研究表明在临床结局和成本效益方面有潜在优势,但目前的证据有限,需要进一步研究。未来的研究应侧重于大规模研究以验证这些发现,特别是关于经济效益方面,并制定儿科环境中LTOWB使用的标准化方案。
治疗研究,III级。