Breast and Thyroid Surgery Department, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, Chongqing, China.
Breast and Thyroid Surgery Department, Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72385-0.
This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes of breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy (BCS + RT) and mastectomy in early breast cancer (EBC) patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), and sought to construct and authenticate a machine learning algorithm that could assist healthcare professionals in formulating personalized treatment strategies for this patient population. We analyzed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on EBC patients undergoing BCS + RT or mastectomy post-NST (2010-2018). Employing propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize potential biases, we compared breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) between the two surgical groups. Additionally, we trained and validated six machine learning survival models and developed a cloud-based recommendation system for surgical treatment based on the optimal model. Among the 13,958 patients, 9028 (64.7%) underwent BCS + RT and 4930 (35.3%) underwent mastectomy. After PSM, there were 3715 patients in each group. Compared to mastectomy, BCS + RT significantly improved BCSS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Prognostic variables associated with BCSS were utilized to develop machine learning models. In both the training and validation cohorts, the random survival forest (RSF) model demonstrated superior predictive performance (0.847 and 0.795), not only outperforming other machine learning models, including Rpart (0.725 and 0.707), Xgboost (0.762 and 0.727), Glmboost (0.748 and 0.788), Survctree (0.764 and 0.766), and Survsvm (0.777 and 0.790), but also outperforming the classical COX model (0.749 and 0.782). Lastly, a web-based prediction tool was built to facilitate clinical application [ https://jhren.shinyapps.io/shinyapp1 ]. After adjusting other confounders, BCS + RT was associated with improved outcomes in patients with EBC after NST, compared to those who underwent mastectomy. Moreover, the RSF model, a reliable tool, can predict long-term outcomes for patients, providing valuable guidance for operative methods and postoperative follow-up.
这项研究旨在比较接受新辅助全身治疗(NST)的早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者行保乳手术加放疗(BCS+RT)和乳房切除术的长期结果,并构建和验证一种机器学习算法,以帮助医疗保健专业人员为该患者群体制定个性化的治疗策略。我们分析了 Surveillance、Epidemiology 和 End Results 数据库中接受 NST 后行 BCS+RT 或乳房切除术的 EBC 患者的数据(2010-2018 年)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来最小化潜在的偏倚,比较两组手术患者的乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和总体生存(OS)。此外,我们还训练和验证了六个机器学习生存模型,并基于最佳模型开发了一个用于手术治疗的云推荐系统。在 13958 名患者中,9028 名(64.7%)接受了 BCS+RT,4930 名(35.3%)接受了乳房切除术。PSM 后,每组各有 3715 名患者。与乳房切除术相比,BCS+RT 显著改善了 BCSS(p<0.001)和 OS(p<0.001)。利用与 BCSS 相关的预后变量开发了机器学习模型。在训练和验证队列中,随机生存森林(RSF)模型均表现出优异的预测性能(0.847 和 0.795),不仅优于其他机器学习模型,包括 Rpart(0.725 和 0.707)、Xgboost(0.762 和 0.727)、Glmboost(0.748 和 0.788)、Survctree(0.764 和 0.766)和 Survsvm(0.777 和 0.790),而且优于经典 COX 模型(0.749 和 0.782)。最后,构建了一个基于网络的预测工具,以促进临床应用[https://jhren.shinyapps.io/shinyapp1]。在调整其他混杂因素后,与接受乳房切除术的患者相比,NST 后行 BCS+RT 的 EBC 患者的结局得到改善。此外,RSF 模型作为一种可靠的工具,可以预测患者的长期预后,为手术方法和术后随访提供有价值的指导。