Suppr超能文献

使用微创脱垂系统装置(MIPS)经阴道网片修补术后手术失败的预测因素。

Predictor of Surgical Failure Following Transvaginal Mesh Repair Using Minimally Invasive Prolapse System Device (MIPS).

作者信息

Yang Yao-Yu, Loo Zi-Xi, Lin Kun-Ling, Long Cheng-Yu

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80145, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 10;13(18):5352. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185352.

Abstract

The Minimally Invasive Prolapse System (MIPS) device, a novel single-incision transvaginal mesh, represents recent advancements in mesh technology, providing lightweight, biocompatible support for pelvic organ prolapse while reducing erosion, allowing for customization and improving surgical outcomes. This study aimed to identify factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence after transvaginal mesh (TVM) repair using the Minimally Invasive Prolapse System device. Two hundred and eighteen women with symptomatic stage II to IV POP underwent TVM. Preoperative and postoperative assessments included urinalyses and pelvic examinations using the POP quantification (POP-Q) staging system. During a follow-up period of 12-46 months, 7 of 218 (3.2%) women experienced POP recurrence. Univariate analysis was conducted to identify predictors of surgical failure, revealing no significant differences in body mass index, POP stage, or preoperative urinary symptoms between the recurrence and success groups ( > 0.05). However, functional urethral length <20 mm based on urodynamics ( = 0.011), ICI-Q scores ≥7 ( = 0.012), and the first 60 surgical cases ( = 0.018) were significant predictors of surgical failure. Multivariate logistic regression confirmed these findings. Functional urethral length <20 mm, ICI-Q scores ≥7, and limited surgical experience were significant predictors of TVM failure using the Minimally Invasive Prolapse System kit. POP recurrence after mesh repair is less likely beyond the learning curve.

摘要

微创脱垂系统(MIPS)装置是一种新型单切口经阴道网片,代表了网片技术的最新进展,可为盆腔器官脱垂提供轻质、生物相容性良好的支撑,同时减少侵蚀,实现定制化并改善手术效果。本研究旨在确定使用微创脱垂系统装置经阴道网片(TVM)修复后盆腔器官脱垂(POP)复发的相关因素。218例有症状的Ⅱ至Ⅳ期POP女性接受了TVM治疗。术前和术后评估包括尿液分析以及使用盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)分期系统进行盆腔检查。在12至46个月的随访期内,218例女性中有7例(3.2%)出现POP复发。进行单因素分析以确定手术失败的预测因素,结果显示复发组和成功组在体重指数、POP分期或术前泌尿系统症状方面无显著差异(>0.05)。然而,基于尿动力学的功能性尿道长度<20 mm(=0.011)、ICI-Q评分≥7(=0.012)以及最初的60例手术病例(=0.018)是手术失败的显著预测因素。多因素逻辑回归证实了这些发现。功能性尿道长度<20 mm、ICI-Q评分≥7以及手术经验有限是使用微创脱垂系统套件进行TVM失败的显著预测因素。网片修复后POP复发在学习曲线之外的可能性较小。

相似文献

2
Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Apr;161(2):224-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
3
Predictors of voiding dysfunction following Uphold™ mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Dec;255:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.09.041. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity in women with pelvic organ prolapse following transvaginal mesh repair.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Apr;42(4):427-33. doi: 10.1111/jog.12927. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Anterior-apical single-incision mesh surgery (SIMS): surgical and functional outcomes at 1 year.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Jan;22(1):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
9
Anatomical and Functional Outcomes of Prolift Transvaginal Mesh for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2016 Sep;8(3):159-64. doi: 10.1111/luts.12090. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
10
One-year outcome of concurrent anterior and posterior transvaginal mesh surgery for treatment of advanced urogenital prolapse: case series.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.003. Epub 2010 May 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Anterior-apical Transvaginal Mesh (Calistar-S) for Treatment of Advanced Urogenital Prolapse: Surgical and Functional Outcomes at 1 Year.
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 May;35(5):1011-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05749-9. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Update in Transvaginal Grafts: The Role of Lightweight Meshes, Biologics, and Hybrid Grafts in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;48(3):515-533. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2021.05.006.
3
Mesh-augmented transvaginal repair of recurrent or complex anterior pelvic organ prolapse in accordance with the SCENIHR opinion.
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Apr;32(4):819-827. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04525-9. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
5
The international discussion and the new regulations concerning transvaginal mesh implants in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):1997-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04407-0. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
6
Sacrocolpopexy compared with transvaginal mesh surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16324. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;56(2):276-88. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318282f2e8.
10
Risk factors of surgical failure following transvaginal mesh repair for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Apr;161(2):224-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.009. Epub 2012 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验