BACKGROUND

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) kits are needed to finalise the transition from Sanger sequencing to NGS in HIV-1 genotypic drug resistance testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared a homemade NGS amplicon-based protocol and the AD4SEQ HIV-1 Solution v2 (AD4SEQ) NGS kit from Arrow Diagnostics for identifying resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) above the 5% threshold in 28 plasma samples where Sanger sequencing previously detected at least one RAM.

RESULTS

The samples had a median 4.8 log [IQR 4.4-5.2] HIV-1 RNA copies/mL and were mostly subtype B (61%) and CRF02_AG (14%). Homemade NGS had a lower rate of samples with low-coverage regions (2/28) compared with AD4SEQ (13/28) ( < 0.001). Homemade NGS and AD4SEQ identified additional mutations with respect to Sanger sequencing in 13/28 and 9/28 samples, respectively. However, there were two and eight cases where mutations detected by Sanger sequencing were missed by homemade NGS and AD4SEQ-SmartVir, respectively. The discrepancies between NGS and Sanger sequencing resulted in a few minor differences in drug susceptibility interpretation, mostly for NNRTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the NGS systems identified additional mutations with respect to Sanger sequencing, and the agreement between them was fair. However, AD4SEQ should benefit from technical adjustments allowing higher sequence coverage.