Zhou Hui-Min, Xu Yi-Wen, Tao Chun-Jie, Fan Jiang-Rong, You Jing-Yang, Ruan Jia-Cheng, Shen Si-Qi, Wang Zhen, Zheng Yong
Department of Orthopaedics, Xianning Central Hospital, Xianning 437000, Hubei, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2024 Sep 25;37(9):899-904. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230613.
To explore clinical effect of closed reduction percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail assisted by arthrography in the treatment of radial neck fracture in children.
A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 children with radial neck fracture treated with arthrography assisted closed reduction and percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail internal fixation (arthrography with elastic nail group) from January 2019 to December 2022, including 12 males and 11 females, aged from 2 to 12 years old with an average of (7.36±1.89) years old;According to Judet fracture types, 14 children were type Ⅲ and 9 children were type Ⅳ. In addition, 23 children with radial neck fracture were selected from January 2015 to December 2018 who were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail fixation (elastic nail group), including 11 males and 12 females, aged from 2 to 14 years old with an average of (7.50±1.91) years old;Judet classification included 15 children were type Ⅲ and 8 children were type Ⅳ. Operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times were compared between two groups. Metaizeau evaluation criteria was used to evaluate fracture reduction, and Tibone-Stoltz evaluation criteria was used to evaluate functional recovery of elbow between two groups.
Both groups were followed up for 12 to 24 months with an average of (16.56±6.34) months. Operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy times of elastic nail group were (56.64±19.27) min and (21.13±7.87) times, while those of joint angiography with elastic nail group were (40.33±11.50) min and (12.10±3.52) times;there were difference between two groups (<0.05). According to Metaizeau evaluation, 11 patients got excellent result, 9 good and 3 fair in joint angiography with elastic nail group, while in elastic nail group, 5 excellent, 13 good, 4 acceptable, and 1 poor;the difference between two groups was statistically significant (<0.05). According to Tibone-Stoltz criteria, 14 patients got excellent result, 8 good, and 1 fair in joint arthrography with elastic nail group;while in elastic nail group, 12 patients got excellent result, 9 good, 1 fair and 1 poor;there was no significant difference between two groups (>0.05).
Compared to percutaneous elastic intramedullary nail fixation, closed reduction assisted by arthrography has advantages of reduced operation time, decreased intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and improved fracture reduction. Arthrography enables clear visualization of the anatomical structures of radius, head, neck, bone, and cartilage in children, facilitating comprehensive display of fracture reduction and brachioradial joint alignment. This technique more precisely guides the depth of elastic intramedullary nail implantation in radius neck, thereby enhancing surgical efficiency and success rate.
探讨关节造影辅助下闭合复位经皮弹性髓内钉治疗儿童桡骨颈骨折的临床效果。
回顾性分析2019年1月至2022年12月采用关节造影辅助闭合复位及经皮弹性髓内钉内固定治疗的23例儿童桡骨颈骨折患者(关节造影联合弹性钉组),其中男12例,女11例,年龄2~12岁,平均(7.36±1.89)岁;按Judet骨折分型,Ⅲ型14例,Ⅳ型9例。另外,选取2015年1月至2018年12月采用闭合复位及经皮弹性髓内钉固定治疗的23例儿童桡骨颈骨折患者(弹性钉组),其中男11例,女12例,年龄2~14岁,平均(7.50±1.91)岁;Judet分型Ⅲ型15例,Ⅳ型8例。比较两组手术时间及术中透视次数。采用Metaizeau评估标准评价骨折复位情况,采用Tibone-Stoltz评估标准评价两组肘关节功能恢复情况。
两组均随访12~24个月,平均(16.56±6.34)个月。弹性钉组手术时间及术中透视次数分别为(56.64±19.27)min和(21.13±7.87)次,关节造影联合弹性钉组分别为(40.33±11.50)min和(12.10±3.52)次;两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。按Metaizeau评估,关节造影联合弹性钉组优11例,良9例,可3例;弹性钉组优5例,良13例,可4例,差1例;两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。按Tibone-Stoltz标准,关节造影联合弹性钉组优14例,良8例,可1例;弹性钉组优12例,良9例,可1例,差1例;两组比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。
与经皮弹性髓内钉固定相比,关节造影辅助下闭合复位具有手术时间缩短、术中透视次数减少、骨折复位效果改善等优点。关节造影能清晰显示儿童桡骨小头、颈、骨质及软骨的解剖结构,有利于全面展示骨折复位及肱桡关节对合情况。该技术能更精确地引导弹性髓内钉植入桡骨颈的深度,从而提高手术效率及成功率。