Geppert T D, Lipsky P E
J Immunol. 1985 Dec;135(6):3750-62.
The effect of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) on endothelial cell (EC) and fibroblast (FB) class II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) gene product expression and antigen presenting ability was examined. Control FB did not express class II MHC gene products, whereas a small (less than 1%) population of passaged EC expressed class II gene products. IFN-gamma induced a comparable density of HLA-DR expression on nearly all EC and FB. IFN-gamma-treated EC and FB also expressed HLA-DP but at a lower density, whereas HLA-DQ expression was barely detectable on either cell type. Control FB were not able to stimulate allogeneic T4 cell DNA synthesis or function as antigen-presenting cells (APC). Control EC were also unable to stimulate allogeneic T4 cell DNA synthesis unless large numbers of stimulator cells were used. Small numbers of IFN-gamma-treated EC were able to stimulate allogeneic T4 cell DNA synthesis, whereas larger numbers were markedly more effective than control EC. In contrast, IFN-gamma-treated FB were ineffective stimulators of allogeneic T4 cell DNA synthesis. IFN-gamma-treated FB were able to present the exogenous antigen SKSD to autologous but not allogeneic T4 cells, but they were extremely inefficient APC. The inability of IFN-gamma-treated FB to function as APC could not be explained by FB-mediated immunosuppression, Ia density, or HLA-DQ expression. This limited capacity of IFN-gamma-treated FB to participate in Ia-restricted functional interactions with T4 cells correlated with a similar diminished capacity to support nonspecific mitogen-induced proliferation of T4 cells before IFN-gamma-induced Ia expression. This accessory cell function was not enhanced by IFN-gamma treatment. Monocytes syngeneic to the responding T4 cells but not interleukin 1 (IL 1) permitted IFN-gamma-treated FB but not control FB to stimulate allogeneic T4 cell DNA synthesis, but they remained markedly less effective stimulators than monocytes. Moreover, IFN-gamma-treated FB were effective stimulators of alloprimed T4 cells, in contrast to their inability to stimulate fresh T4 cells. Furthermore, monocytes and IFN-gamma-treated FB were comparably effective stimulators of alloreactive T cell lines. These data suggest that accessory cells perform functions unrelated to Ia and IL 1 that are necessary for mitogen-, alloantigen-, and antigen-induced proliferation of freshly isolated T cells. Monocytes and EC effectively perform this function, but FB do not. This accessory cell function does not seem to be as important for the activation of primed T cells.
研究了γ干扰素(IFN-γ)对内皮细胞(EC)和成纤维细胞(FB)Ⅱ类主要组织相容性复合体(MHC)基因产物表达及抗原呈递能力的影响。对照FB不表达Ⅱ类MHC基因产物,而传代的EC中有一小部分(小于1%)表达Ⅱ类基因产物。IFN-γ在几乎所有的EC和FB上诱导出相当密度的HLA-DR表达。经IFN-γ处理的EC和FB也表达HLA-DP,但密度较低,而在这两种细胞类型上几乎检测不到HLA-DQ的表达。对照FB不能刺激同种异体T4细胞的DNA合成,也不能作为抗原呈递细胞(APC)发挥作用。对照EC也不能刺激同种异体T4细胞的DNA合成,除非使用大量的刺激细胞。少量经IFN-γ处理的EC能够刺激同种异体T4细胞的DNA合成,而大量的经IFN-γ处理的EC比对照EC明显更有效。相反,经IFN-γ处理的FB对同种异体T4细胞的DNA合成是无效的刺激物。经IFN-γ处理的FB能够将外源性抗原SKSD呈递给自体T4细胞而非同种异体T4细胞,但它们作为APC的效率极低。经IFN-γ处理的FB不能作为APC发挥作用,这不能用FB介导的免疫抑制、Ia密度或HLA-DQ表达来解释。经IFN-γ处理的FB参与与T4细胞的Ia限制性功能相互作用的能力有限,这与在IFN-γ诱导Ia表达之前支持T4细胞非特异性丝裂原诱导增殖的能力类似地降低有关。IFN-γ处理并没有增强这种辅助细胞功能。与反应性T4细胞同基因的单核细胞而非白细胞介素1(IL-1)能使经IFN-γ处理的FB而非对照FB刺激同种异体T4细胞的DNA合成,但它们作为刺激物仍明显不如单核细胞有效。此外,与它们不能刺激新鲜T4细胞相反,经IFN-γ处理的FB是同种异体预致敏T4细胞的有效刺激物。此外,单核细胞和经IFN-γ处理的FB对同种异体反应性T细胞系的刺激效果相当。这些数据表明,辅助细胞执行与Ia和IL-1无关的功能,这些功能对于新鲜分离的T细胞的丝裂原、同种异体抗原和抗原诱导的增殖是必需的。单核细胞和EC有效地执行这一功能,但FB则不能。这种辅助细胞功能对于预致敏T细胞的激活似乎不那么重要。