Scalise Enrica, Costa Davide, Bolboacă Sorana D, Ielapi Nicola, Bevacqua Egidio, Cristodoro Lucia, Faga Teresa, Michael Ashour, Andreucci Michele, Bracale Umberto Marcello, Serra Raffaele
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Interuniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2025 Jan;110(Pt A):34-46. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.08.009. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Carotid revascularization procedures, such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), can lead to restenosis. Monitoring restenosis onset through biomarkers is crucial in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate inflammation biomarkers in CEA and CAS to determine their predictive value for restenosis risk postprocedure.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical records of patients with carotid stenosis who underwent CEA or CAS over 1 year at the vascular surgery departments of an interuniversity center. Eligible asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis (70%-99%) underwent revascularization. Differences between preprocedural and early postprocedural inflammation indices were assessed, and restenosis risk was evaluated using receiver operating curve analysis and logistic regression.
The cohort comprised 100 patients, 68 undergoing CEA and 32 undergoing CAS. Significant values were observed for inflammation ratios post-CEA: neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) (P = 0.036), platelets to lymphocytes ratio (PLR) (P = 0.009), monocytes to lymphocytes ratio (MLR) (P < 0.001), systemic inflammation index (SII) (P = 0.024), systemic immune response index (SIRI) (P = 0.003), and aggregate inflammation response index (AISI) (P < 0.001). At 12-month follow-up, 12% of patients experienced restenosis; 50% were men and 50% women. Women showed a higher restenosis rate (26.1% vs 7.8%). Preintervention NLR (odds ratio {OR} [95% confidence interval {CI}] = 13.38 [1.88 to 95.44], P = 0.010) and SIRI (OR [95% CI] = 10.22 [2.65 to 39.43], P = 0.001) remained significantly associated with restenosis after adjusting for sex and smoking.
The study provided a predictive model for restenosis, identifying preintervention NLR and SIRI as independent predictors of restenosis at 12-month follow-up.
颈动脉血运重建手术,如颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS),可导致再狭窄。在临床实践中,通过生物标志物监测再狭窄的发生至关重要。本研究旨在评估CEA和CAS中的炎症生物标志物,以确定它们对术后再狭窄风险的预测价值。
对一所大学间中心血管外科在1年多时间内接受CEA或CAS的颈动脉狭窄患者的临床记录进行回顾性分析。符合条件的无症状颈动脉狭窄(70%-99%)患者接受血运重建。评估术前和术后早期炎症指标的差异,并使用受试者工作特征曲线分析和逻辑回归评估再狭窄风险。
该队列包括100名患者,68例行CEA,32例行CAS。CEA术后炎症比值出现显著变化:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(P = 0.036)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)(P = 0.009)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)(P < 0.001)、全身炎症指数(SII)(P = 0.024)、全身免疫反应指数(SIRI)(P = 0.003)和总炎症反应指数(AISI)(P < 0.001)。在12个月的随访中,12%的患者出现再狭窄;其中50%为男性,50%为女性。女性的再狭窄率更高(26.1%对7.8%)。在对性别和吸烟进行调整后,术前NLR(比值比{OR}[95%置信区间{CI}]=13.38[1.88至95.44],P = 0.010)和SIRI(OR[95%CI]=10.22[2.65至39.43],P = 0.001)仍与再狭窄显著相关。
该研究提供了一个再狭窄预测模型,确定术前NLR和SIRI为12个月随访时再狭窄的独立预测因素。