Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Haemostaseology and Medical Intensive Care, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University.
European Center for AngioScience (ECAS) and German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) Partner Site Heidelberg/Mannheim.
Int Heart J. 2024;65(5):823-832. doi: 10.1536/ihj.24-023.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (CRT-Ds) are established therapy options for patients suffering from heart failure (HF). Several aspects of HF modification have yet to be described regarding etiology-dependent outcome differences in the long-term.The Mannheim CArdiac Resynchronization TherApy RetrospeCtive ObservAtioNAl (MARACANA) Registry retrospectively included all patients provided with CRTs in our center from 2013 to 2021. CRT-D recipients (n = 380) were grouped to either ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM, n = 206) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM, n = 174). Both groups were compared regarding survival, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hospitalizations due to HF, intrinsic and paced QRS width, NYHA classification, and several further aspects of HF modification in the long-term (59.1 ± 4.81 months).Patients with ICM were older (73.3 ± 8.4 versus 67.7 ± 10.8 years) and predominantly male (86.4 versus 74.7%) and presented with higher creatinine values (1.57 ± 0.92 versus 1.31 ± 0.66 mg/dL, each P < 0.05) at baseline. The mean survival for patients with NICM was better (51.9 ± 1.2 versus 54.4 ± 1.1 months, P = 0.03). Improvements in NYHA (2.93 ± 0.4 versus 2.79 ± 0.5-2.19 ± 0.7 versus 1.79 ± 0.7) and LVEF (26.4 ± 6.8 versus 27% ± 6.9% to 35.7 ± 9.6 versus 44 ± 11%, each P < 0.05) were similar for both groups after 5 years. Patients with ICM experienced more hospitalizations due to HF within the first year (odds ratio 1.9, P < 0.05), whereas electrical remodeling was more impressive for NICM (QRS width 157.1 ± 19.4 milliseconds versus intrinsic 116.6 ± 12.7 milliseconds and paced 131.9 ± 21 milliseconds after 5 years, both P < 0.05).Patients with HF might experience long-term improvements in functional status and left ventricular reverse remodeling following CRT-D, regardless of underlying etiology. Alterations in some aspects of HF modification could be influenced by time- and etiology-associated comorbidities.
心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)是心力衰竭(HF)患者的既定治疗选择。在长期治疗中,仍有几个与病因相关的 HF 修正方面有待描述,包括与结局差异有关的方面。
曼海姆心脏再同步治疗回顾性观察(MARACANA)登记处回顾性纳入了 2013 年至 2021 年期间在我院接受 CRT 的所有患者。将 CRT-D 接受者(n=380)分为缺血性心肌病(ICM,n=206)或非缺血性心肌病(NICM,n=174)。比较两组的存活率、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、HF 住院、固有和起搏 QRS 宽度、NYHA 分级以及长期 HF 修正的其他几个方面(59.1±4.81 个月)。
ICM 患者年龄更大(73.3±8.4 岁比 67.7±10.8 岁),主要为男性(86.4%比 74.7%),基线时肌酐值更高(1.57±0.92mg/dL 比 1.31±0.66mg/dL,均 P<0.05)。NICM 患者的中位生存期更长(51.9±1.2 个月比 54.4±1.1 个月,P=0.03)。两组 5 年后 NYHA(2.93±0.4 比 2.79±0.5-2.19±0.7 比 1.79±0.7)和 LVEF(26.4±6.8 比 27%±6.9%至 35.7±9.6 比 44%±11%,均 P<0.05)均有改善。ICM 患者在第一年因 HF 住院的次数更多(优势比 1.9,P<0.05),而 NICM 的电重构更为显著(5 年后 QRS 宽度为 157.1±19.4 毫秒,固有 QRS 宽度为 116.6±12.7 毫秒,起搏 QRS 宽度为 131.9±21 毫秒,均 P<0.05)。
无论病因如何,HF 患者在接受 CRT-D 后可能会长期改善功能状态和左心室逆重构。HF 修正的某些方面的变化可能受到与时间和病因相关的合并症的影响。