Suppr超能文献

基于富氟透锂长石的二硅酸锂陶瓷全冠边缘适合性的评价:一项对比研究。

Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns: An Comparative Study.

作者信息

Sultan Sherif El Sayed, Alsabilah Khaled Ahmad Saud, Alharbi Bader Mahali, Alnaser Addulrhman Fahad

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

出版信息

J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2479-S2481. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_330_24. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving optimal marginal fit is essential for the success of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, we compared the marginal fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns using two different CAD/CAM scanners, powder free (System A, Omnicam) and powder based (System B, Blue cam).

RESULTS

The mean marginal gap for System A was found to be 63.5 μm (standard deviation ± 10.2 μm), while for System B, it was 57.8 μm (standard deviation ± 9.8 μm). System B demonstrated a slightly superior marginal fit compared to System A, with a difference of 5.7 μm.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both Omnicam and Blue cam produced clinically acceptable marginal fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns. However, Blue cam exhibited a slightly better marginal fit compared to Omnicam. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.

摘要

背景

实现最佳边缘适合度对于基于Virgilite的二硅酸锂陶瓷冠的成功至关重要。

材料与方法

在本研究中,我们使用两种不同的CAD/CAM扫描仪,即无粉(系统A,Omnicam)和基于粉末(系统B,Blue cam),比较了基于Virgilite的二硅酸锂陶瓷冠的边缘适合度。

结果

发现系统A的平均边缘间隙为63.5μm(标准差±10.2μm),而系统B的平均边缘间隙为57.8μm(标准差±9.8μm)。系统B的边缘适合度略优于系统A,相差5.7μm。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,Omnicam和Blue cam都能产生临床上可接受的基于Virgilite的二硅酸锂陶瓷冠的边缘适合度。然而,Blue cam的边缘适合度略优于Omnicam。需要进一步的临床研究来验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Marginal Fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns: An Comparative Study.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2479-S2481. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_330_24. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
2
Marginal Fit Comparison of CAD/CAM Crowns Milled from Two Different Materials.
J Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;27(5):421-428. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12683. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
Effect of Crystallization Firing on Marginal Gap of CAD/CAM Fabricated Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
J Prosthodont. 2018 Jan;27(1):63-66. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12638. Epub 2017 May 17.
4
Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jan;121(1):124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.035. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun;127(6):890-898. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.027. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown.
J Adv Prosthodont. 2015 Aug;7(4):271-7. doi: 10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.271. Epub 2015 Aug 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):377-383. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.03.024. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
2
Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations.
J Oral Rehabil. 2005 Jun;32(6):441-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x.
3
Marginal fit of gold inlay castings.
J Prosthet Dent. 1966 Mar-Apr;16(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(66)90082-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验