Sultan Sherif El Sayed, Alsabilah Khaled Ahmad Saud, Alharbi Bader Mahali, Alnaser Addulrhman Fahad
Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakakah, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2479-S2481. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_330_24. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
Achieving optimal marginal fit is essential for the success of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns.
In this study, we compared the marginal fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns using two different CAD/CAM scanners, powder free (System A, Omnicam) and powder based (System B, Blue cam).
The mean marginal gap for System A was found to be 63.5 μm (standard deviation ± 10.2 μm), while for System B, it was 57.8 μm (standard deviation ± 9.8 μm). System B demonstrated a slightly superior marginal fit compared to System A, with a difference of 5.7 μm.
Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both Omnicam and Blue cam produced clinically acceptable marginal fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns. However, Blue cam exhibited a slightly better marginal fit compared to Omnicam. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.
实现最佳边缘适合度对于基于Virgilite的二硅酸锂陶瓷冠的成功至关重要。
在本研究中,我们使用两种不同的CAD/CAM扫描仪,即无粉(系统A,Omnicam)和基于粉末(系统B,Blue cam),比较了基于Virgilite的二硅酸锂陶瓷冠的边缘适合度。
发现系统A的平均边缘间隙为63.5μm(标准差±10.2μm),而系统B的平均边缘间隙为57.8μm(标准差±9.8μm)。系统B的边缘适合度略优于系统A,相差5.7μm。
在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,Omnicam和Blue cam都能产生临床上可接受的基于Virgilite的二硅酸锂陶瓷冠的边缘适合度。然而,Blue cam的边缘适合度略优于Omnicam。需要进一步的临床研究来验证这些发现。