Zeggil Teagan, Nickonchuk Tony, Rennert-May Elissa, Rajakumar Irina
Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Drug Utilization and Stewardship Pharmacist, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 25;4(1):e150. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.92. eCollection 2024.
To compare prescribing patterns of restricted antimicrobials before and after the removal of prior authorization and to develop a prospective audit and feedback program to mitigate the potential inappropriate prescribing of these antimicrobials.
An interrupted time-series analysis assessing the trends in antibiotic use was conducted between May 2020 and February 2023 in large urban hospitals, where all ASP activities were discontinued in May 2022 and a pilot prospective audit and feedback (PAF) program was initiated in January 2023.
The collective change in restricted antibiotic utilization after the removal of prior authorization was trending towards increased utilization but was not statistically significant. With the PAF program, 9.8% of patients were identified by the antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists as requiring intervention. Within these patients, 19 different recommendations were made, with the most common being to narrow the therapeutic spectrum (47.4%). Stewardship interventions suggestions were accepted (full and partial) 69.2% of the time.
Although there were some small statistically significant changes detected for a few antibiotics, there were no situations where those changes remained significant after appropriate controls were added to the analyses. As such, the intervention may not have had any statistically significant impact on DDDs of the studied antibiotics.
比较取消预先授权前后限制使用抗菌药物的处方模式,并制定一项前瞻性审核与反馈计划,以减轻这些抗菌药物潜在的不适当处方情况。
在2020年5月至2023年2月期间,对大型城市医院进行了一项中断时间序列分析,评估抗生素使用趋势。在这些医院中,所有抗菌药物管理活动于2022年5月停止,一项前瞻性审核与反馈(PAF)试点计划于2023年1月启动。
取消预先授权后,限制使用抗生素的总体使用量变化呈上升趋势,但无统计学意义。通过PAF计划,抗菌药物管理药师确定9.8%的患者需要干预。在这些患者中,提出了19项不同的建议,最常见的是缩小治疗范围(47.4%)。管理干预建议被接受(完全接受和部分接受)的比例为69.2%。
尽管对少数抗生素检测到一些微小的具有统计学意义的变化,但在分析中加入适当的对照后,这些变化均不再具有统计学意义。因此,该干预措施可能对所研究抗生素的限定日剂量(DDD)没有任何统计学意义上的影响。