Gelsey Felicia T, Schapiro David, Kosa Katherine, Vass Caroline, Perez-Nieves Magaly, Pierce Anna, Poon Jiat Ling, DiBenedetti Dana, Mansfield Carol
Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
RTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Diabetes Ther. 2024 Nov;15(11):2367-2379. doi: 10.1007/s13300-024-01652-0. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
Daily insulin administration can be burdensome for people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) and can impact treatment adherence. This study investigated preferences for once-weekly, long-acting basal insulin for treatment of PwT2D.
An online discrete-choice experiment was administered to PwT2D in the USA. Qualitative interviews informed the selection of six attributes: reduction in A1c level after 6 months, amount of time spent in optimal blood sugar range each day, number of serious low blood sugar events, number of nighttime low blood sugar events, change in weight because of the insulin over 6 months, and frequency of administration. Each participant completed eight questions offering a choice between two long-acting insulins; questions varied according to an experimental design. A fixed treatment choice question asked about preferences for daily versus weekly insulin, holding other treatment features constant. Data were analyzed using random-parameters logit models, and heterogeneity was explored through subgroup analyses.
Four hundred sixty-six PwT2D completed the survey (mean age, 57; mean A1c, 7.5%; 59.0% female); 33.3% of these were currently on a basal/bolus regimen, 34.3% used basal only, and 32.4% were insulin naive. Respondents placed the most importance on avoiding a 10-pound weight change and equal importance on the largest change in the number of serious and nighttime low blood sugar events per year and achieving the longest time in range included in the choice questions. There was significant heterogeneity in preferences by experience: insulin-naive respondents had stronger preferences for scheduled and flexible weekly insulin over daily insulin; 67.6% preferred flexible weekly over daily insulin, all else being equal.
PwT2D valued insulin efficacy and reducing treatment-related adverse events, with heterogeneity in the relative importance of administration frequency. All else being equal, respondents preferred weekly over daily basal insulin. These findings provide insights into the preferences of PwT2D considering weekly long-acting insulin.
每日注射胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者(PwT2D)来说可能是一项负担,并且会影响治疗依从性。本研究调查了2型糖尿病患者对每周一次长效基础胰岛素治疗的偏好。
对美国的2型糖尿病患者进行了一项在线离散选择实验。定性访谈为六个属性的选择提供了依据:6个月后糖化血红蛋白(A1c)水平的降低、每天处于最佳血糖范围内的时间、严重低血糖事件的数量、夜间低血糖事件的数量、6个月内因胰岛素导致的体重变化以及给药频率。每位参与者完成八个问题,这些问题提供了两种长效胰岛素之间的选择;问题根据实验设计而有所不同。一个固定的治疗选择问题询问了在其他治疗特征不变的情况下,对每日胰岛素与每周胰岛素的偏好。使用随机参数logit模型对数据进行分析,并通过亚组分析探讨异质性。
466名2型糖尿病患者完成了调查(平均年龄57岁;平均糖化血红蛋白7.5%;59.0%为女性);其中33.3%目前采用基础/餐时胰岛素治疗方案,34.3%仅使用基础胰岛素,32.4%未使用过胰岛素。受访者最重视避免体重变化10磅,同等重视每年严重和夜间低血糖事件数量的最大变化以及在选择问题中实现最长的血糖达标时间。偏好存在显著的经验异质性:未使用过胰岛素的受访者对预定和灵活的每周胰岛素治疗方案的偏好强于每日胰岛素治疗方案;在其他条件相同的情况下,67.6%的人更喜欢灵活的每周胰岛素治疗方案而非每日胰岛素治疗方案。
2型糖尿病患者重视胰岛素疗效和减少治疗相关不良事件,给药频率的相对重要性存在异质性。在其他条件相同的情况下,受访者更喜欢每周基础胰岛素而非每日基础胰岛素。这些发现为考虑每周长效胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者的偏好提供了见解。