Emergency Department, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP).
Sorbonne Université, IMProving Emergency Care (IMPEC) FHU Paris, Paris, France.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Dec 1;31(6):423-428. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001176. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
Gender bias in healthcare can significantly influence clinical decision-making, potentially leading to disparities in treatment outcomes. This study addresses the impact of patient gender on the decision-making process for establishing a ceiling of care in emergency medicine, particularly the decision to limit tracheal intubation.
To determine whether patient gender influences emergency physicians' decisions regarding the recommendation for tracheal intubation in critically ill patients.
A European survey-based study was conducted using a standardized clinical scenario to assess physicians' decisions in a controlled setting.
The survey targeted European emergency physicians over a 2-week period in April 2024. A total of 3423 physicians participated, with a median age of 40 years and a distribution of 46% women. Physicians were presented with a clinical vignette of a 75-year-old patient in acute respiratory distress. The vignettes were randomized to vary only by the patient's gender (woman/man) and level of functional status: (1) can grocery shop alone, (2) cannot grocery shop alone but can bathe independently, or (3) cannot perform either task independently.
The primary outcome was the recommendation for intubation, with secondary analyses exploring the influence of patient functional status levels. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders, including physician gender, age, experience, and practice setting.
A total of 3423 physicians responded, mostly from France, Spain, Italy, and the UK (1,532, 494, 247, and 245 respectively). Women patients were less likely to be intubated compared to male patients [67.9% vs. 71.7%; difference 3.81%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.7-6.9%]. The likelihood of recommending intubation decreased with lower levels of patient functional status. Women physician gender was also associated with a reduced likelihood of recommending intubation.
This study suggests a significant gender-based disparity in emergency care decision-making, with women patients being less likely to receive recommendations for intubation. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to potential limitations in the representativity of respondents and the uncertain applicability of survey responses to real-life clinical practice.
医疗保健中的性别偏见会对临床决策产生重大影响,可能导致治疗结果存在差异。本研究旨在探讨患者性别对急诊医学中确立治疗上限决策的影响,特别是对限制气管插管的决策。
确定患者性别是否影响急诊医师对危重症患者进行气管插管建议的决策。
这是一项在欧洲进行的基于调查的研究,使用标准化临床情景在受控环境中评估医师的决策。
该调查在 2024 年 4 月的两周内针对欧洲急诊医师进行,共有 3423 名医师参与,中位数年龄为 40 岁,性别分布为 46%为女性。医师收到一份 75 岁急性呼吸窘迫患者的临床病历。病历随机分为仅患者性别(女性/男性)和功能状态级别不同:(1)可以独自去杂货店购物,(2)不能独自去杂货店购物但可以独立洗澡,或(3)不能独立完成任何一项任务。
主要结局是插管建议,次要分析探讨了患者功能状态水平的影响。多变量逻辑回归用于调整潜在混杂因素,包括医师性别、年龄、经验和执业环境。
共有 3423 名医师作出回应,他们主要来自法国、西班牙、意大利和英国(1532 名、494 名、247 名和 245 名)。与男性患者相比,女性患者接受插管的可能性较低[67.9%比 71.7%;差异 3.81%;95%置信区间(CI),0.7-6.9%]。随着患者功能状态水平的降低,推荐插管的可能性也随之降低。女性医师性别也与降低推荐插管的可能性相关。
本研究表明,在急诊护理决策中存在显著的性别差异,女性患者接受插管建议的可能性较低。然而,由于受访者代表性的潜在局限性以及调查结果对现实临床实践的不确定适用性,这些结果应谨慎解释。