Department of Pain, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):E715-E724.
Spinal cord stimulation can be considered in PHN patients if conservative treatment is not effective. However, the long-term pain outcomes of temporary (7-14 days) spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) in refractory PHN patients with a course of more than 3 months have not been documented.
To investigate the efficacy of tSCS as a treatment for refractory PHN.
Retrospective study.
Pain Department in a university hospital.
A total of 52 patients with refractory PHN were treated with tSCS between March 2018 and February 2021. Their medical records were collected, and the patients were divided into 3 groups according to the course of their disease into the medium-term group, long-term group and ultra-long-term group. The changes in the numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) responses, pain relief rate, postoperative efficiency and patients' use of analgesics were recorded before the operation, 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation.
The average NRS scores, the maximum NRS scores and the PSQI scores at 3 days, 10 days, one month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the operation were significantly lower than those before the operation (P < 0.05). The average NRS scores and the maximum NRS scores of all groups increased significantly from one month to 6 months compared to those at 10 days after the tSCS treatment, and they decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months post-operation. The average NRS scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than that of the ultra-long-term group at 1-3 months after the operation, and the maximum NRS scores at one month, 3 months and 12 months after the operation were also significantly lower in the medium-term and long-term group compared to the ultra-long-term group. The average PSQI scores at 1-12 months after the operation were not significantly higher than that at 10 days after the operation, but it decreased significantly at 12 months compared with 6 months after the operation. Among the 3 groups, the PSQI scores of the medium-term and long-term group were significantly lower than those of the ultra-long-term group at 6 months after the operation. The postoperative pain relief rate ranged from 41.51%-59.81%, and the total effective rate was 42.31%-69.23%, and there was no significant difference among the 3 groups. Some patients still needed analgesics at 12 months after the operation, but the number of patients who were taking medications post-operation was significantly lower than that before the operation.
This is a single-center retrospective study with the inability to completely control for variables. Additionally, the number of cases is small and the follow-up duration is short.
tSCS can be used as a safe and effective method to relieve refractory PHN, and the curative effect is substantially higher in patients with a disease course of 3-12 months compared to that in patients with a course of more than 12 months.
如果保守治疗无效,可以考虑对 PHN 患者进行脊髓刺激。然而,病程超过 3 个月的难治性 PHN 患者接受为期 7-14 天的临时脊髓刺激(tSCS)的长期疼痛结局尚未得到记录。
探讨 tSCS 治疗难治性 PHN 的疗效。
回顾性研究。
大学医院疼痛科。
2018 年 3 月至 2021 年 2 月,52 例难治性 PHN 患者接受 tSCS 治疗。收集患者病历,根据病程分为中期组、长期组和超长组。记录患者术前、术后 3 天、10 天、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的数字评分量表(NRS)评分、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)反应、疼痛缓解率、术后效率和患者使用镇痛药情况。
术后 3 天、10 天、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月的 NRS 评分平均值、最大 NRS 评分和 PSQI 评分均明显低于术前(P<0.05)。与 tSCS 治疗后 10 天相比,所有组在术后 1 个月至 6 个月的 NRS 评分平均值和最大 NRS 评分均显著升高,与术后 6 个月相比,术后 12 个月的 NRS 评分平均值和最大 NRS 评分均显著降低。术后 1-3 个月,中、长期组的 NRS 评分平均值明显低于超长组,术后 1 个月、3 个月和 12 个月的最大 NRS 评分也明显低于超长组。术后 1-12 个月的 PSQI 评分平均值均高于术后 10 天,但与术后 6 个月相比,PSQI 评分平均值显著降低。3 组中,中、长期组术后 6 个月的 PSQI 评分明显低于超长组。术后疼痛缓解率为 41.51%-59.81%,总有效率为 42.31%-69.23%,3 组间差异无统计学意义。部分患者术后 12 个月仍需服用镇痛药,但术后服药患者数量明显少于术前。
这是一项单中心回顾性研究,无法完全控制变量。此外,病例数量较少,随访时间较短。
tSCS 可作为治疗难治性 PHN 的安全有效方法,病程 3-12 个月的患者疗效明显高于病程超过 12 个月的患者。