Rodriguez-Calienes Aaron, Vivanco-Suarez Juan, Castillo-Huerta Nicole M, Espinoza-Martinez David, Morán-Mariños Cristian, Espiritu-Vilcapoma Ximena, Rivera-Angles Valeria, Ortega-Gutierrez Santiago
Neuroscience, Clinical Effectiveness and Public Health Research Group, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Peru.
Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Oct 3:15910199241284412. doi: 10.1177/15910199241284412.
The Surpass Evolve (SE) has emerged as a promising alternative treatment from the flow diverter series. The utilization of the SE has gradually increased, however, there is a scarcity of comprehensive data on the solidity of this technology in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the SE flow diverter.
A systematic literature search from inception to April 2024 was conducted across five databases for studies involving IAs treated with the SE. The primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of complete aneurysm occlusion at the final follow-up, and the primary safety outcome comprised a composite of early and delayed complications. Subgroup analyses based on aneurysm size, anatomical location, and rupture status were also conducted.
Our analysis included nine studies with 645 patients and 722 IAs. Effectiveness outcomes revealed an overall complete aneurysm occlusion rate of 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 58%-78%; = 72%) and a favorable aneurysm occlusion rate of 91% (95% CI = 82%-96%; = 49%). Safety outcomes demonstrated an overall complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 3%-12%; = 66%), with an early complications rate of 6% (95% CI = 4%-11%; = 0%), and a delayed complications rate of 0% (95% CI = 0%-7%; = 0%).
Our findings suggest a favorable outcome with a high rate of complete aneurysm occlusion at the last follow-up, with acceptable rates of neurological complications. Future research efforts should focus on larger, prospective studies with standardized outcome measures to further elucidate the clinical utility of the SE flow diverter in the management of IAs.
超越进化型(SE)血流导向装置已成为血流导向系列中一种有前景的替代治疗方法。SE的应用逐渐增多,然而,关于该技术在颅内动脉瘤(IA)血管内治疗中的可靠性,缺乏全面的数据。本荟萃分析旨在评估SE血流导向装置的安全性和有效性。
对五个数据库进行从开始到2024年4月的系统文献检索,以查找涉及用SE治疗IA的研究。主要有效性结局是末次随访时动脉瘤完全闭塞的比例,主要安全性结局包括早期和延迟并发症的综合情况。还进行了基于动脉瘤大小、解剖位置和破裂状态的亚组分析。
我们的分析纳入了9项研究,共645例患者和722个IA。有效性结局显示,动脉瘤总体完全闭塞率为69%(95%置信区间(CI)=58%-78%;I²=72%),良好动脉瘤闭塞率为91%(95%CI=82%-96%;I²=49%)。安全性结局表明,总体并发症发生率为6%(95%CI=3%-12%;I²=66%),早期并发症发生率为6%(95%CI=4%-11%;I²=0%),延迟并发症发生率为0%(95%CI=0%-7%;I²=0%)。
我们的研究结果表明,末次随访时动脉瘤完全闭塞率高,神经并发症发生率可接受,预后良好。未来的研究应集中在更大规模的、采用标准化结局指标的前瞻性研究上,以进一步阐明SE血流导向装置在IA治疗中的临床应用价值。