Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
School of Graduate Studies, Lingnan University, Tai Po, Hong Kong.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2024 Dec;94(4):1245-1270. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12718. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
This study examined how parenting styles influence children's language skills and reading comprehension.
Six hundred and eighty-five Chinese-speaking third graders (M = 9.23 years, SD = .66; 341 girls) were randomly recruited from eight primary schools. We measured students' primary caregivers' parenting styles, parental education, family income, migration status, number of children's extracurricular books in the home and family cohesion at Wave 1 (i.e. grade 3). We also assessed students' reading motivation, language skills (i.e. vocabulary knowledge and syntactic awareness) and reading comprehension at Wave 2 (i.e. grade 4).
The structural equation model analysis revealed that parenting styles indirectly affect language and reading comprehension development, with authoritative and authoritarian parenting exerting different influences on the two outcomes. Specifically, authoritative parenting was positively related to the number of children's books, which in turn was directly, or indirectly through reading motivation, associated with children's language skills and reading comprehension. In contrast, authoritarian parenting was negatively related to family cohesion, which was associated with children's reading motivation, and consequently, their language skills and reading comprehension. The multigroup analysis showed that the indirect pathways varied slightly across parental migration statuses.
These findings enhance the global understanding of the pathways linking parenting styles to children's language skills and reading comprehension, suggesting that educators and researchers should not overly emphasize the direct role of parenting styles in children's academic performance.
本研究考察了父母教养方式如何影响儿童的语言技能和阅读理解。
从八所小学随机招募了 685 名讲中文的三年级学生(M=9.23 岁,SD=.66;341 名女生)。我们在第一波(即三年级)测量了学生的主要照顾者的教养方式、父母教育程度、家庭收入、移民身份、家中儿童课外书籍数量和家庭凝聚力。我们还在第二波(即四年级)评估了学生的阅读动机、语言技能(即词汇知识和句法意识)和阅读理解。
结构方程模型分析表明,教养方式通过多种途径间接影响语言和阅读理解的发展,其中权威型和专制型教养方式对这两个结果有不同的影响。具体而言,权威型教养方式与儿童书籍数量呈正相关,而儿童书籍数量又直接或通过阅读动机间接与儿童的语言技能和阅读理解相关。相比之下,专制型教养方式与家庭凝聚力呈负相关,而家庭凝聚力又与儿童的阅读动机相关,进而与他们的语言技能和阅读理解相关。多群组分析表明,间接途径在父母移民身份之间略有差异。
这些发现增强了对父母教养方式与儿童语言技能和阅读理解之间关系的全球理解,表明教育工作者和研究人员不应过分强调教养方式在儿童学业成绩中的直接作用。