• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降压药物对糖尿病患者衰弱加重风险的影响:一项队列研究

The impact of blood pressure lowering agents on the risk of worsening frailty among patients with diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.

作者信息

Wang Jui, Lee Szu-Ying, Chao Chia-Ter, Huang Jenq-Wen, Chien Kuo-Liong

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Health Data Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

NPJ Aging. 2024 Oct 7;10(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00173-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41514-024-00173-1
PMID:39375355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11458616/
Abstract

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at risk of developing frailty, but studies rarely addressed risk factors for frailty worsening. We investigated whether blood pressure (BP)-lowering agents influenced such risk in these patients. Adults with type 2 DM were identified from National Taiwan University Hospital, with the primary outcome, the worsening of frailty by ≧1 score increase of FRAIL scale determined. We used the Cox proportional hazards analysis to derive the risk of worsening frailty associated with BP-lowering agents. Among 41,440 patients with DM, 27.4% developed worsening frailty after 4.09 years of follow-up. Cox regression revealed that diuretics (hazard ratio (HR) 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.18) and α-blocker (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06-1.23) users had a significantly higher risk of worsening frailty than non-users, whereas the risk was lower among β-blocker users (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.98). It would be therefore prudent to weigh the advantages and disadvantages of using specific BP-lowering agent classes.

摘要

糖尿病(DM)患者有发生衰弱的风险,但很少有研究探讨衰弱恶化的危险因素。我们调查了降压药物是否会影响这些患者的此类风险。从台湾大学医院识别出2型糖尿病成年人,主要结局为根据衰弱量表(FRAIL)评分增加≧1分判定的衰弱恶化。我们使用Cox比例风险分析来得出与降压药物相关的衰弱恶化风险。在41440例糖尿病患者中,27.4%在4.09年的随访后出现衰弱恶化。Cox回归显示,使用利尿剂(风险比(HR)1.12,95%置信区间(CI)1.06 - 1.18)和α受体阻滞剂(HR 1.14,95% CI 1.06 - 1.23)的患者衰弱恶化风险显著高于未使用者,而β受体阻滞剂使用者的风险较低(HR 0.93,95% CI 0.88 - 0.98)。因此,权衡使用特定类别降压药物的利弊是谨慎的做法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/063fd0099305/41514_2024_173_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/d22538deb3b3/41514_2024_173_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/de172940cb0e/41514_2024_173_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/063fd0099305/41514_2024_173_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/d22538deb3b3/41514_2024_173_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/de172940cb0e/41514_2024_173_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d78/11458616/063fd0099305/41514_2024_173_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of blood pressure lowering agents on the risk of worsening frailty among patients with diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.降压药物对糖尿病患者衰弱加重风险的影响:一项队列研究
NPJ Aging. 2024 Oct 7;10(1):44. doi: 10.1038/s41514-024-00173-1.
2
Both pre-frailty and frailty increase healthcare utilization and adverse health outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.无论是衰弱前期还是衰弱,都会增加 2 型糖尿病患者的医疗保健利用和不良健康结局。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 Sep 27;17(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0772-2.
3
The Impact of Glucose-Lowering Strategy on the Risk of Increasing Frailty Severity among 49,519 Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.降糖策略对49519例糖尿病患者衰弱严重程度增加风险的影响:一项纵向队列研究
Aging Dis. 2023 Oct 1;14(5):1917-1926. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.0225.
4
Muscle relaxant use and the associated risk of incident frailty in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a longitudinal cohort study.糖尿病肾病患者使用肌肉松弛剂及其发生衰弱的相关风险:一项纵向队列研究。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Jun 11;12:20420986211014639. doi: 10.1177/20420986211014639. eCollection 2021.
5
Frailty predicts a higher risk of incident urolithiasis in 525 368 patients with diabetes mellitus: a population-based study.虚弱预测了 525368 例糖尿病患者中结石形成的更高风险:一项基于人群的研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000755.
6
Increased risk of gastrointestinal malignancy in patients with diabetes mellitus and correlations with anti-diabetes drugs: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.糖尿病患者胃肠道恶性肿瘤风险增加及其与抗糖尿病药物的相关性:台湾一项基于全国人口的研究
Intern Med. 2013;52(9):939-46. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.52.8276. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
7
The frailty risk trajectory associated with kidney and cardiovascular morbidities among patients with incident diabetes: A population-based study.初诊糖尿病患者的肾脏和心血管合并症相关脆弱风险轨迹:一项基于人群的研究。
Atherosclerosis. 2022 Oct;358:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2022.06.1010. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
Frailty increases the risk for developing urinary tract infection among 79,887 patients with diabetic mellitus and chronic kidney disease.在79887例糖尿病和慢性肾病患者中,衰弱会增加发生尿路感染的风险。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jun 7;21(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02299-3.
9
Associations Between Frailty and the Increased Risk of Adverse Outcomes Among 38,950 UK Biobank Participants With Prediabetes: Prospective Cohort Study.38950 名英国生物库参与者中衰弱与糖尿病前期不良结局风险增加的关系:前瞻性队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 May 18;9:e45502. doi: 10.2196/45502.
10
Frailty risk in hospitalised older adults with and without diabetes mellitus.住院老年患者伴或不伴糖尿病的衰弱风险。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(19-20):3510-3521. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14529. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetically determined blood pressure, antihypertensive drug classes, and frailty: A Mendelian randomization study.遗传决定的血压、降压药类别与虚弱:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
Aging Cell. 2024 Jul;23(7):e14173. doi: 10.1111/acel.14173. Epub 2024 May 9.
2
Associations Between Hypertension, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, and Physical Performance in Very Old Adults: Results from the ilSIRENTE Study.高龄老年人高血压、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂与身体机能之间的关联:来自ilSIRENTE研究的结果
J Frailty Aging. 2024;13(2):74-81. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2024.15.
3
Frailty is associated with 90-day mortality in urgent thoracic surgery conditions.
在急诊胸外科手术情况下,衰弱与90天死亡率相关。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Nov 22;17:336-343. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.10.037. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Genetically determined blood pressure, antihypertensive medications, and risk of intracranial aneurysms and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A Mendelian randomization study.遗传决定的血压、降压药物与颅内动脉瘤和蛛网膜下腔出血破裂风险:一项孟德尔随机研究。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Mar;9(1):244-250. doi: 10.1177/23969873231204420. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
5
Associations between modifiable risk factors and frailty: a Mendelian randomisation study.可改变风险因素与虚弱之间的关联:一项孟德尔随机化研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2023 Dec;77(12):782-790. doi: 10.1136/jech-2023-220882. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
6
Multivariate genome-wide analysis of aging-related traits identifies novel loci and new drug targets for healthy aging.多变量全基因组分析与衰老相关的特征,确定了新的与健康衰老相关的基因座和新的药物靶点。
Nat Aging. 2023 Aug;3(8):1020-1035. doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00455-5. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
Clinical impacts of frailty on 123,172 people with diabetes mellitus considering the age of onset and drugs of choice: a nationwide population-based 10-year trajectory analysis.考虑发病年龄和首选药物,衰弱对 123172 例糖尿病患者的临床影响:一项全国范围内基于人群的 10 年轨迹分析。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jul 1;52(7). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad128.
8
Identifying Patients for Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Based on Cognitive Benefit: A Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT Randomized Clinical Trial.基于认知获益识别需要强化降压治疗的患者:SPRINT 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2314443. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14443.
9
The Impact of Glucose-Lowering Strategy on the Risk of Increasing Frailty Severity among 49,519 Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.降糖策略对49519例糖尿病患者衰弱严重程度增加风险的影响:一项纵向队列研究
Aging Dis. 2023 Oct 1;14(5):1917-1926. doi: 10.14336/AD.2023.0225.
10
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for frailty in patients with diabetes.开发和验证用于预测糖尿病患者衰弱风险的模型。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03823-3.