Su Ying, Liu Wen-Jun, Zhao Yu-Feng, Zhang Yi-Jie, Qiu Yue, Lu Zhi-Hui, Wang Peng, Lin Shuang, Tu Guo-Wei, Luo Zhe
Cardiac Intensive Care Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Oct 8;14(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01387-y.
Modified furosemide responsiveness index (mFRI) is a novel biomarker for assessing diuretic response and AKI progression in patients with early AKI. However, the comparative predictive performance of mFRI and novel renal biomarkers for adverse renal outcomes remains unclear. In a single-center prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the discriminatory abilities of mFRI and other novel renal biomarkers in predicting AKI progression and prognosis in patients with initial mild and moderate AKI (KDIGO stage 1 to 2).
Patients with initial mild and moderate AKI within 48 h following cardiac surgery were included in this study. The mFRI, renal biomarkers (including serum or urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [sNGAL or uNGAL], serum cystatin C, urinary N-acetyl-beta-D-glycosaminidase [uNAG], urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio) and cytokines (TNF, IL-1β, IL-2R, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-10) were measured at AKI diagnosis. The mFRI was calculated for each patient, which was defined as 2-hour urine output divided by furosemide dose and body weight. Of 1013 included patients, 154 (15.2%) experienced AKI progression, with 59 (5.8%) progressing to stage 3 and 33 (3.3%) meeting the composite outcome of hospital mortality or receipt of renal replacement therapy (RRT). The mFRI showed non-inferiority or potential superiority to renal biomarkers and cytokines in predicting AKI progression (area under the curve [AUC] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.82), progression to stage 3 (AUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.89), and composite outcome of death and receipt of RRT (AUC 0.85, 95% CI 0.82-0.87). Furthermore, the combination of a functional biomarker (mFRI) and a urinary injury biomarker (uNAG or uNGAL) resulted in a significant improvement in the prediction of adverse renal outcomes than either individual biomarker (all P < 0.05). Moreover, incorporating these panels into clinical model significantly enhanced its predictive capacity for adverse renal outcomes, as demonstrated by the C index, integrated discrimination improvement, and net reclassification improvement (all P < 0.05).
As a rapid, cost-effective and easily accessible biomarker, mFRI, exhibited superior or comparable predictive capabilities for AKI progression and prognosis compared to renal biomarkers in cardiac surgical patients with mild to moderate AKI.
Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04962412. Registered July 15, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04962412?cond=NCT04962412&draw=2&rank=1 .
改良呋塞米反应指数(mFRI)是一种用于评估早期急性肾损伤(AKI)患者利尿反应和AKI进展的新型生物标志物。然而,mFRI与新型肾脏生物标志物对不良肾脏结局的比较预测性能仍不明确。在一项单中心前瞻性研究中,我们旨在评估mFRI和其他新型肾脏生物标志物在预测初始轻度和中度AKI(KDIGO 1至2期)患者AKI进展和预后方面的鉴别能力。
本研究纳入了心脏手术后48小时内初始轻度和中度AKI的患者。在AKI诊断时测量了mFRI、肾脏生物标志物(包括血清或尿中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白[sNGAL或uNGAL]、血清胱抑素C、尿N-乙酰-β-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶[uNAG]、尿白蛋白与肌酐比值)和细胞因子(TNF、IL-1βIL-2R、IL-6、IL-8和IL-10)。计算了每位患者的mFRI,其定义为2小时尿量除以呋塞米剂量和体重。在1013例纳入患者中,154例(15.2%)经历了AKI进展,其中59例(5.8%)进展至3期,33例(3.3%)达到医院死亡或接受肾脏替代治疗(RRT)的复合结局。在预测AKI进展(曲线下面积[AUC]0.80,95%置信区间[CI]0.77-0.82)、进展至3期(AUC 0.87,95%CI 0.85-0.89)以及死亡和接受RRT的复合结局(AUC 0.85,95%CI 0.82-0.87)方面,mFRI显示出不劣于或可能优于肾脏生物标志物和细胞因子。此外,功能生物标志物(mFRI)和尿损伤生物标志物(uNAG或uNGAL)的组合在预测不良肾脏结局方面比单一生物标志物有显著改善(所有P<0.05)。此外,如C指数、综合判别改善和净重新分类改善所示(所有P<0.05),将这些指标纳入临床模型显著增强了其对不良肾脏结局的预测能力。
作为一种快速、经济有效且易于获取的生物标志物,mFRI在预测轻度至中度AKI心脏手术患者的AKI进展和预后方面,与肾脏生物标志物相比表现出优越或相当的预测能力。
Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04962412。于2021年7月15日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04962412?cond=NCT04962412&draw=2&rank=1 。