Thomson Katie, Todhunter-Brown Alex, Brady Marian C, Campbell Pauline, Dorris Liam, Hunter Susan M, Nicolson Donald J, Hazelton Christine
Department of Occupational Therapy, Human Nutrition & Dietetics, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Department of Nursing & Community Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 8;10(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00637-4.
We conducted an NIHR-funded evidence synthesis project, reviewing evidence relating to interventions for perceptual disorders following stroke. This related paper describes how people with lived experience of stroke-related perceptual disorders contributed to and influenced the project, and identifies lessons for future review projects.
We planned our patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) activities within a study protocol, described according to the domains of the ACTIVE framework; these were founded on principles for good practice in PPIE. Activities occurred across the lifespan of the project, consisting primarily of group discussions and voting to determine if there was consensus. To assess impact and individual experiences, we sought feedback using an evaluation form after each discussion, and conducted an online meeting at the end of the project to allow further reflection.
We recruited five people to a Lived Experience Group, including two stroke survivors and three carers. Members attended one face-to-face meeting during the development of the review. Subsequent activities were all held online due to the COVID-19 pandemic; with six online meetings, plus email interactions. Positive impacts of the Lived Experience Group on the reviews included clear definitions of key terms, selection of outcome measures, agreement on implications of review findings, and identification of research recommendations. Key challenges identified related to the complexity of the topic and challenges in the use of new online technology as a consequence of the COVID-pandemic.
A number of lessons were learned during this project. Specific recommendations for future PPIE are to ensure that those involved have an opportunity to get to know one another, and to provide optional sessions to increase familiarity with online meeting software, clear explanations of the purpose of involvement and specific feedback after each activity. These lessons should be considered when planning the PPIE within future reviews.
我们开展了一项由英国国家健康研究所(NIHR)资助的证据综合项目,回顾与中风后感知障碍干预措施相关的证据。这篇相关论文描述了有中风相关感知障碍亲身经历的人如何参与并影响该项目,并确定了对未来综述项目的经验教训。
我们在一份研究方案中规划了患者及公众参与和介入(PPIE)活动,并根据ACTIVE框架的领域进行描述;这些活动基于PPIE的良好实践原则。活动贯穿项目全程,主要包括小组讨论和投票以确定是否达成共识。为评估影响和个人经历,我们在每次讨论后使用评估表征求反馈意见,并在项目结束时召开一次在线会议以便进一步反思。
我们招募了五人加入亲身经历小组,其中包括两名中风幸存者和三名护理人员。小组成员在综述制定过程中参加了一次面对面会议。由于新冠疫情,后续活动均在线上举行;共进行了六次线上会议,外加电子邮件互动。亲身经历小组对综述的积极影响包括明确关键术语的定义、选择结局指标、就综述结果的影响达成一致意见以及确定研究建议。确定的主要挑战与主题的复杂性以及因新冠疫情使用新在线技术时遇到的困难有关。
在这个项目中我们吸取了一些经验教训。对未来PPIE的具体建议是确保参与人员有机会相互了解,提供选修课程以增加对在线会议软件的熟悉程度,明确说明参与目的,并在每次活动后提供具体反馈。在规划未来综述中的PPIE时应考虑这些经验教训。