Department of Neurosurgery, Izmir City Hospital, Izmir-Türkiye.
Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, 9 Eylul University, Izmir-Türkiye.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024 Oct;30(10):745-753. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.57658.
This study aimed to describe our clinical experience with surgical approaches and patient management for traumatic multiple-level continuous and noncontinuous thoracolumbar spinal fractures.
We retrospectively evaluated patients with continuous and noncontinuous multiple-level thoracolumbar fractures who were operated on by the same surgical team from 2019 to 2021. These patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=12, continuous fractures) and Group 2 (n=14, noncontinuous fractures). We assessed the patients' age, gender, fracture levels, fracture type, classification according to the AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) Spine Thoracolumbar Fracture Classification, status of posterior ligament damage, presence of additional traumatic pathology, status of decompression via laminectomy, levels of stabilization and fusion, preoperative and postoperative neurological status, presence of cervical trauma, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, and lordosis and kyphosis angles in terms of fusion status and postoperative follow-up over two years. The study excluded patients over the age of 65, those with single-level fractures, and pathological fractures caused by osteoporosis, infection, or spinal tumors.
Gender, age, neurological status, application of laminectomy, surgical complications, status of cervical fracture, duration of operation, amount of blood loss, duration of hospitalization, lordosis, and kyphosis angles were uniformly distributed between the groups. All patients underwent fusions, ranging from three to eight, with a median of two (range 2-4) fracture levels, and a median of five instrumented vertebrae, ranging from four to seven. Significant differences between the two groups were observed in terms of operation duration (p=0.001), blood loss (p=0.010), duration of hospitalization (p=0.003), number of fusions (p<0.001), and instrumented vertebral segments (p=0.011).
Thus, a surgical approach involving decompression, vertebral fusion screws, allografts, and bone substitutes can enhance surgical outcomes for patients with continuous and noncontinuous vertebral fractures.
本研究旨在描述我们在治疗创伤性多节段连续和非连续胸腰椎脊柱骨折方面的手术经验。
我们回顾性评估了 2019 年至 2021 年由同一手术团队治疗的连续和非连续多节段胸腰椎骨折患者。这些患者分为两组:组 1(n=12,连续骨折)和组 2(n=14,非连续骨折)。我们评估了患者的年龄、性别、骨折节段、骨折类型、根据 AO(Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen)脊柱胸腰椎骨折分类的分类、后韧带损伤情况、是否存在额外的创伤性病变、减压后路减压术、稳定和融合水平、术前和术后神经状况、是否存在颈椎损伤、手术时间、失血量、住院时间、融合状态下的后凸和前凸角度以及术后两年的随访。该研究排除了年龄超过 65 岁的患者、单节段骨折患者以及由骨质疏松症、感染或脊柱肿瘤引起的病理性骨折患者。
性别、年龄、神经状态、椎板切除术的应用、手术并发症、颈椎骨折的状态、手术时间、失血量、住院时间、后凸和前凸角度在两组之间均匀分布。所有患者均进行了融合,融合范围从三节到八节,中位数为两节(范围 2-4)骨折节段,中位数为五节固定椎骨,范围为四节到七节。两组之间在手术时间(p=0.001)、失血量(p=0.010)、住院时间(p=0.003)、融合数量(p<0.001)和固定椎骨节段(p=0.011)方面存在显著差异。
因此,减压、椎体融合螺钉、同种异体移植物和骨替代物的手术方法可以提高连续和非连续椎体骨折患者的手术效果。