• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全科医生可能会提高法国的宫颈癌筛查公平性。

General practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France.

机构信息

Département Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université de Toulouse, Faculté de Médecine, Toulouse, 31062, France.

Equity Team: Team Labeled By the French League Against Cancer, UMR1295 CERPOP, Toulouse, 31073, France.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):2748. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18942-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-18942-8
PMID:39385183
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11462826/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vulnerable social groups have greater difficulty in accessing care and a lower quality of care. Health systems focused on primary care appear to be more effective, efficient and equitable. However, difficulties in accessing primary care are persisting. We focused on primary care screening for cervical cancer through Cervico-Uterine Smear (CUS), which has been shown to be effective in reducing disease incidence and mortality. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of women who undergo CUS according to the category of health professionals (general practitioners or gynaecologists) performing CUS and to analyse potential differences in access to care in terms of socioeconomic and geographical characteristics.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study based on data from the main health insurance schemes in France, allowing analysis of health care consumption according to socioeconomic levels and proximity to health care services. We included women aged 25 to 64 years in 2012 for whom CUS would be a relevant procedure (695,694). The sociodemographic and territorial indicators were age, geographical area deprivation, and the availability of gynaecological care. The analysis was performed using multinomial logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 202,271 (29%) patients underwent CUS; of whom 68% underwent CUS administered by gynaecologists and 28% were administered by general practitioners (GPs). However, inequalities in CUS screening rates were observed, with a decrease in the number of CUSs performed with increased age, a rural location, deprivation, and sparse health care provisions. Deprived people seemed less penalised by GPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Involvement of General Practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France. The organisation of health systems around primary care may allow a better access to care and to account for the specific needs of deprived populations.

摘要

背景

弱势群体在获得医疗保健方面面临更大的困难,并且其获得的医疗保健质量也较低。以初级保健为重点的卫生系统似乎更有效、更高效和更公平。然而,获得初级保健的困难仍然存在。我们专注于通过子宫颈涂片(CUS)进行的宫颈癌初级保健筛查,该方法已被证明可以有效降低疾病发病率和死亡率。在这项研究中,我们旨在根据执行 CUS 的卫生专业人员(全科医生或妇科医生)类别,研究接受 CUS 的妇女的特征,并分析在社会经济和地理特征方面获得医疗保健的潜在差异。

方法

这是一项基于法国主要健康保险计划数据的回顾性观察性研究,允许根据社会经济水平和接近医疗服务的程度分析医疗保健消费。我们纳入了 2012 年年龄在 25 至 64 岁之间、需要进行 CUS 的女性(695694 人)。社会人口统计学和地域指标包括年龄、地域剥夺程度和妇科保健的可用性。分析采用多项逻辑回归。

结果

共有 202271 名(29%)患者接受了 CUS;其中 68%由妇科医生进行了 CUS,28%由全科医生(GP)进行了 CUS。然而,CUS 筛查率存在不平等现象,随着年龄的增长、农村地区、贫困和医疗服务匮乏,CUS 的数量减少。贫困人群似乎较少受到全科医生的影响。

结论

全科医生的参与可能会提高法国宫颈癌筛查的公平性。以初级保健为中心的卫生系统组织可以更好地获得医疗保健,并考虑到贫困人群的特殊需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0def/11462826/50bfb52131bd/12889_2024_18942_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0def/11462826/c4d220d94422/12889_2024_18942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0def/11462826/50bfb52131bd/12889_2024_18942_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0def/11462826/c4d220d94422/12889_2024_18942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0def/11462826/50bfb52131bd/12889_2024_18942_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
General practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France.全科医生可能会提高法国的宫颈癌筛查公平性。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):2748. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18942-8.
2
Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.社会不平等与宫颈癌筛查:法国全科医生和妇科医生的离散选择实验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 27;20(1):693. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05479-w.
3
The Effect of Cervical Smears Performed by General Practitioners on the Cervical Cancer Screening Rate of their Female Patients: A Claim Database Analysis and Cross-Sectional Survey.《初级保健医生实施宫颈抹片检查对女性患者宫颈癌筛查率的影响:一项理赔数据库分析和横断面调查》
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jul;27(7):933-938. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6656. Epub 2018 Mar 27.
4
General practitioners who never perform Pap smear: the medical offer and the socio-economic context around their office could limit their involvement in cervical cancer screening.从未进行巴氏涂片检查的全科医生:医疗服务提供情况以及其诊所周边的社会经济环境可能会限制他们参与宫颈癌筛查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Aug 15;20(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1004-x.
5
Factors associated with the achievement of cervical smears by general practitioners.全科医生完成宫颈涂片检查的相关因素。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Dec 8;10(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2999-5.
6
Factors associated with Pap smear screening among French women visiting a general practitioner in the Rhône-Alpes region.罗讷-阿尔卑斯地区拜访全科医生的法国女性中与巴氏涂片筛查相关的因素。
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2013 Oct;61(5):437-45. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
7
Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.2005 年至 2010 年法国癌症筛查项目社会经济不平等的时间趋势:癌症晴雨表调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e016941. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016941.
8
Differences in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Rates in Jordan among Women from Different Socioeconomic Strata: Analysis of the 2012 Population-Based Household Survey.约旦不同社会经济阶层女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查率的差异:基于2012年人口的家庭调查分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(15):6697-704. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.15.6697.
9
Do social inequalities in cervical cancer screening persist among patients who use primary care? The Paris Prevention in General Practice survey.初级保健患者中宫颈癌筛查的社会不平等现象是否仍然存在?巴黎普通实践预防调查。
Prev Med. 2011 Sep;53(3):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jun 25.
10
Social and territorial inequalities in breast and cervical cancers screening uptake: a cross-sectional study in France.社会和地域不平等对乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查参与度的影响:法国的一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 22;12(2):e055363. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055363.

本文引用的文献

1
Equity of primary care service delivery for low income "sicker" adults across 10 OECD countries.10 个经合组织国家中,为低收入“病得更重”成年人提供初级保健服务的公平性。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 12;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0892-z.
2
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Total and Site-Specific Cancer Incidence in Germany: A Population-Based Registry Study.德国总体及特定部位癌症发病率的社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的登记研究
Front Oncol. 2018 Sep 25;8:402. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00402. eCollection 2018.
3
Disparities in Access to Sorafenib in Communities with Low Socioeconomic Status.
社会经济地位较低社区在索拉非尼获取方面的差异。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(3):1123-1134. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0083.
4
Factors associated with multiple barriers to access to primary care: an international analysis.与初级保健获取多重障碍相关的因素:一项国际分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 20;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0740-1.
5
Primary or specialist medical care: Which is more equitable? A policy brief.初级医疗还是专科医疗:哪种更公平?政策简报。
Natl Med J India. 2017 Mar-Apr;30(2):93-96.
6
Socioeconomic status and site-specific cancer incidence, a Bayesian approach in a French Cancer Registries Network study.社会经济地位与特定部位癌症发病率:法国癌症登记网络研究中的贝叶斯方法
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Jul;27(4):391-398. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000326.
7
The impact of reimbursement systems on equity in access and quality of primary care: A systematic literature review.报销制度对初级医疗保健可及性和质量公平性的影响:一项系统文献综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 4;16(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1805-8.
8
European Code against Cancer, 4th Edition: Cancer screening.《欧洲抗癌法典》第4版:癌症筛查
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;39 Suppl 1:S139-52. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.021.
9
[Use of medical and administrative databases to measure social health inequalities].[利用医学和行政数据库衡量社会健康不平等现象]
Sante Publique. 2015 May-Jun;27(3):383-94.
10
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in access to primary care among people with chronic conditions.慢性疾病患者获得初级保健的机会存在种族和社会经济差异。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;27(2):189-98. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.02.130246.