Suppr超能文献

迷幻辅助治疗中研究设计与抗抑郁效果的关联:一项荟萃分析。

The association between study design and antidepressant effects in psychedelic-assisted therapy: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Department of Psychiatry, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Psychiatry, Beitou Branch, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2025 Jan 15;369:421-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.016. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

Abstract

Different study designs of psychedelic trials may impact the blinding and expectance, leading to biased treatment effects. This study aimed to examine the association between antidepressant efficacy and study designs in psychedelic trials. Six databases were systematically searched. Eligible trials were required to investigate the efficacy of psychedelics (psilocybin, lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine [MDMA], and ayahuasca) in adult patients with depressive symptoms. We only considered oral psychedelic-assisted therapy without concomitant use of antidepressants. The primary outcome was the change in depressive symptoms. There were five study designs of psychedelic trials, including non-active-drug-as-placebo, active-drug-as-placebo, waitlist-as-control, fixed-order, and pre-post designs. In non-active-drug -as-placebo design, psilocybin (k = 4, Hedges' g [g] = 0.87, 95 % confidence intervals[CIs] = 0.58 to 1.16) and MDMA (k = 2, g = 0.65, 95%CIs = 0.26 to 1.05) were associated with large and medium effect sizes, respectively. In active-drug-as-placebo design, both psilocybin (k = 2, g = 0.71, 95%CIs = -0.01 to 1.43) and MDMA (k = 3, g = 0.53, 95%CIs = -0.23 to 1.28) were not statistically significant. In pre-post single-arm (k = 3, g = 2.51, 95%CIs = 1.00 to 4.02) and waitlist-as-control (k = 1, g = 2.88, 95%CIs = 1.75 to 4.00) designs, psilocybin showed a large effect size of antidepressant effect. Ayahuasca also showed a large effect size in both pre-post (k = 2, g = 1.88, 95%CIs = 1.18 to 2.57) and non-active-drug-as-placebo (k = 1, g = 1.60, 95%CIs = 0.84 to 2.36) designs. LSD was associated with a significant antidepressant effect only in non-active-drug-as-placebo design (k = 1, g = 1.49, 95%CIs = 0.80 to 2.17) but not in active-drug-as-placebo design (k = 1, g = 0.44, 95%CIs = -0.90 to 1.78). The antidepressant effects of psychedelics may be overestimated in studies with pre-post single-arm, non-active-drugs-as placebo, and waitlist-control designs. Restricted sample size, difficulty with establishing blinding for participants, and over expectancy limit the estimation of the antidepressant effect of psychedelic-assisted therapy.

摘要

不同的迷幻药试验设计可能会影响盲法和预期,从而导致治疗效果产生偏差。本研究旨在探讨迷幻药试验中抗抑郁疗效与试验设计之间的关系。系统检索了六个数据库。合格的试验要求调查迷幻剂(裸盖菇素、麦角酸二乙基酰胺[LSD]、3,4-亚甲基二氧甲基苯丙胺[MDMA]和雅鲁安神)在有抑郁症状的成年患者中的疗效。我们只考虑了口服迷幻药辅助治疗,不伴用抗抑郁药。主要结局是抑郁症状的变化。迷幻药试验有五种研究设计,包括非活性药物作为安慰剂、活性药物作为安慰剂、等待名单作为对照、固定顺序和前后设计。在非活性药物作为安慰剂的设计中,裸盖菇素(k=4,g=0.87,95%置信区间[CI]为 0.58 至 1.16)和 MDMA(k=2,g=0.65,95%CI 为 0.26 至 1.05)与大、中效应量相关。在活性药物作为安慰剂的设计中,裸盖菇素(k=2,g=0.71,95%CI 为-0.01 至 1.43)和 MDMA(k=3,g=0.53,95%CI 为-0.23 至 1.28)均无统计学意义。在前后单臂(k=3,g=2.51,95%CI 为 1.00 至 4.02)和等待名单对照(k=1,g=2.88,95%CI 为 1.75 至 4.00)设计中,裸盖菇素显示出较大的抗抑郁效果。雅鲁安神在前后设计(k=2,g=1.88,95%CI 为 1.18 至 2.57)和非活性药物作为安慰剂设计(k=1,g=1.60,95%CI 为 0.84 至 2.36)中也显示出较大的抗抑郁效果。LSD 仅在非活性药物作为安慰剂的设计中与抗抑郁疗效显著相关(k=1,g=1.49,95%CI 为 0.80 至 2.17),而在活性药物作为安慰剂的设计中不相关(k=1,g=0.44,95%CI 为-0.90 至 1.78)。前后单臂、非活性药物作为安慰剂和等待名单对照设计的研究可能高估了迷幻药的抗抑郁作用。研究样本量有限、参与者盲法难以建立以及预期过高限制了迷幻辅助治疗抗抑郁作用的评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验