Suppr超能文献

住房不稳定筛查与转诊计划:一项范围综述

Housing Instability Screening and Referral Programs: A Scoping Review.

作者信息

Asthana Shravan, Gago Luis, Garcia Joshua, Beestrum Molly, Pollack Teresa, Post Lori, Barnard Cynthia, Goel Mita Sanghavi

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2025 Jan;51(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.08.007. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Housing instability in the United States is a critical social determinant of health, influencing health outcomes and health care utilization. This scoping review aimed to analyze literature on US health system screening and response programs addressing housing instability, highlighting methodologies, geographic and demographic variations, and policy implications.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, the review included studies focusing on US health systems that screen and refer for housing instability. Major scholarly databases, including PubMed and Scopus, were queried. Screening and response program characteristics, methodologies, and outcomes were characterized.

RESULTS

Thirty studies published between 2003 and 2023 were included in this study. Included studies were primarily cross-sectional (26.7%) or quality improvement (20.0%), among 9 other designs. Screening programs were predominantly implemented in academic hospital systems (46.7%) and in the Northeast (63.3%). Of the 25 adult population studies, 68.0% were in outpatient settings, and of the 23 studies providing detailed information on their process, 52.2% used electronic health record entry. Of the 22 studies that describe their screening tool, 15 used institution-specific tools, and only 4 of the remaining 7 studies used identical tools. Of the 20 studies that described their response to positive screenings, 13 provided patients with a paper or electronic referral to a collaborating community partner, while only 6 aided the patient in connecting with community resources.

CONCLUSION

This study found significant variability in screening and response programs for housing instability among US health care providers. A lack of standardized definitions and methodologies hampers effective comparison and implementation of these programs. Future research should focus on standardizing screening methods and measurement of interventions and outcomes to address housing instability.

摘要

背景

在美国,住房不稳定是健康的关键社会决定因素,影响健康结果和医疗保健利用。本范围综述旨在分析关于美国卫生系统筛查和应对住房不稳定项目的文献,突出方法、地理和人口差异以及政策影响。

方法

遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,该综述纳入了关注美国卫生系统筛查和转介住房不稳定情况的研究。查询了包括PubMed和Scopus在内的主要学术数据库。对筛查和应对项目的特征、方法和结果进行了描述。

结果

本研究纳入了2003年至2023年发表的30项研究。纳入的研究主要为横断面研究(26.7%)或质量改进研究(20.0%),还有其他9种设计。筛查项目主要在学术医院系统(46.7%)和东北部(63.3%)实施。在25项针对成年人群的研究中,68.0%是在门诊环境中进行的,在23项提供详细过程信息的研究中,52.2%使用电子健康记录录入。在22项描述其筛查工具的研究中,15项使用特定机构的工具,其余7项研究中只有4项使用相同的工具。在20项描述其对阳性筛查反应的研究中,13项为患者提供了纸质或电子转介至合作社区伙伴的服务,而只有6项协助患者联系社区资源。

结论

本研究发现美国医疗服务提供者在住房不稳定筛查和应对项目方面存在显著差异。缺乏标准化定义和方法阻碍了这些项目的有效比较和实施。未来的研究应专注于标准化筛查方法以及干预措施和结果的测量,以解决住房不稳定问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验