Arora Deepak, Choudhary Indra Singh, Dutt Akshat, Banerjee Niladri, Chauhan Anupam Singh, Rodha Mahaveer Singh, Sharma Naveen, Puranik Ashok Kumar, Chauhan Nishant Kumar, Gupta Manoj Kumar, Chaudhary Ramkaran
Department of General Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Department of Trauma Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Injury. 2025 Jan;56(1):111928. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111928. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Thoracic injuries are prevalent in polytrauma patients, with road traffic accidents being a major cause. In India alone, over 400,000 people were injured in such accidents in 2022. Rib fractures, haemothorax, and pneumothorax are common chest injuries, often managed with tube thoracostomy. While standard procedures for chest tube placement are established, consensus on post-insertion management, particularly regarding negative pleural suction, is lacking. Research on this topic mostly pertains to planned thoracotomies rather than trauma cases. This study seeks to compare outcomes of slow negative suction versus conventional drainage in blunt or penetrating thoracic trauma.
This single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial in a western Indian hospital from Jan 2021 to June 2022 included adult patients with thoracic trauma requiring intercostal drainage tubes. Patients needing emergency thoracotomy, mechanical ventilation, or bilateral chest tubes were excluded. Sample size (n = 64) was calculated based on prior studies. Patients were randomly assigned to experimental (slow negative pleural suction) or control (conventional water seal drainage) groups. Both groups received standard care. Primary outcome was time to chest tube removal; secondary outcomes included hospital stay length, complications, and need for further intervention. Data were analysed using SPSS. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
During the study 64 patients were randomised into experimental (n = 32) or conventional (n = 32) groups. Most of the patients were males (88 %, n = 56). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Experimental group patients had shorter median chest tube duration (3 [IQR 2-3.75] vs. 5 [3-8.75] days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (5 [4-8.75] vs. 10 [6-16.75] days, p = 0.004). No discomfort was reported with slow continuous negative pleural suction. Mortality was 1 (3 %) in the experimental group vs. 2 (6 %) in the conventional group. Four patients suffered retained haemothorax, with only one occurrence in the experimental group (3 %).
Application of slow continuous negative pleural suction to chest tubes in patients of thoracic trauma can decrease the chest tube duration and the hospital stay. This study ought to be followed up with multicentric randomised clinical trials with larger sample sizes to better characterise the effects of slow continuous negative pleural suction.
胸部损伤在多发伤患者中很常见,道路交通事故是主要原因。仅在印度,2022年就有超过40万人在这类事故中受伤。肋骨骨折、血胸和气胸是常见的胸部损伤,通常采用胸腔闭式引流术治疗。虽然胸腔闭式引流管置入的标准程序已经确立,但对于置管后的管理,特别是关于负压吸引,仍缺乏共识。关于这个主题的研究大多涉及计划性开胸手术,而非创伤病例。本研究旨在比较钝性或穿透性胸部创伤中缓慢负压吸引与传统引流的效果。
这项于2021年1月至2022年6月在印度西部一家医院进行的单中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,纳入了需要肋间引流管的胸部创伤成年患者。需要急诊开胸手术、机械通气或双侧胸腔闭式引流管的患者被排除。根据先前的研究计算样本量(n = 64)。患者被随机分配到试验组(缓慢负压吸引)或对照组(传统水封引流)。两组均接受标准护理。主要结局是胸腔闭式引流管拔除时间;次要结局包括住院时间、并发症以及进一步干预的需求。使用SPSS分析数据。显著性设定为p < 0.05。
在研究期间,64例患者被随机分为试验组(n = 32)和传统组(n = 32)。大多数患者为男性(88%,n = 56)。两组基线特征相似。试验组患者的胸腔闭式引流管中位留置时间较短(3 [四分位间距2 - 3.75]天对5 [3 - 8.75]天,p < 0.001),住院时间也较短(5 [4 - 8.75]天对10 [6 - 16.75]天,p = 0.004)。缓慢持续负压吸引未报告不适。试验组死亡率为1例(3%),传统组为2例(6%)。4例患者发生血胸残留,试验组仅1例(3%)。
对胸部创伤患者的胸腔闭式引流管应用缓慢持续负压吸引可缩短胸腔闭式引流管留置时间和住院时间。本研究应通过更大样本量的多中心随机临床试验进行随访,以更好地描述缓慢持续负压吸引的效果。