• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

矿工职业事故:对过去 13 年发表的研究进行范围综述。

Occupational accidents in mining workers: scoping review of studies published in the last 13 years.

机构信息

Universidad Cesar Vallejo, Trujillo, Peru.

Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad, Cusco, Peru.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e080572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080572.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080572
PMID:39395823
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11474850/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mining activity represents one of the most hazardous occupations related to health, with 8% of fatal injuries concentrated in this sector worldwide. Thus, it is crucial to timely identify the factors involved in such injuries. We aimed to explore the sociodemographic and occupational/organisational factors associated with injuries, causative agents and subsequent disabilities and fatality of workers exposed to occupational injuries in the mining sector.

DESIGN

A secondary scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

Scopus, Embase, Virtual Health Library, SciELO and PubMed databases were searched in February 2022 and updated in October 2023. The protocol was developed in April 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We included observational studies published within the last 13 years (2010-2022) which provided information on injuries of the mining workers and reported associated factors as well as health consequences.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers examined the eligibility criteria, screened and coded the extracted information using prevalidated data extraction tools, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 123 studies were found, of which nine were selected for inclusion in this review. Participants were between 15 and 80 years old, and the rate of injuries ranged from 4.4% to 10.6% of reported cases. Among the total selected studies, mechanical agents were identified as the leading cause of injuries in six studies. The factors associated with injuries included age, gender (female) and biochemical characteristics. On the other hand, occupational and organisational factors encompassed work shift, outsourcing (contractors) and less than 2 years of experience in the sector.

CONCLUSION

This review emphasises that both work-related and individual characteristics are significantly related factors of injuries. Moreover, commonly reported health consequences of injuries encompass mortality, average days lost and permanent, partial or total disability.

摘要

目的

采矿作业是与健康相关的最危险职业之一,全球有 8%的致命伤害集中在这一领域。因此,及时识别此类伤害涉及的因素至关重要。我们旨在探讨与矿工职业伤害相关的社会人口学和职业/组织因素、致伤因素以及随后的残疾和死亡。

设计

按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的指南进行二次范围审查。

数据来源

2022 年 2 月在 Scopus、Embase、虚拟健康图书馆、SciELO 和 PubMed 数据库进行检索,并于 2023 年 10 月更新。该方案于 2022 年 4 月制定。

选择研究的资格标准

我们纳入了在过去 13 年(2010-2022 年)内发表的观察性研究,这些研究提供了矿工受伤信息,并报告了相关因素以及健康后果。

数据提取和综合

两名独立评审员根据《系统评价和荟萃分析扩展报告的首选报告项目》的预验证数据提取工具,检查资格标准、筛选和编码提取的信息。

结果

共发现 123 项研究,其中 9 项被选入本综述。参与者年龄在 15 至 80 岁之间,报告病例的受伤率从 4.4%至 10.6%不等。在所选择的研究中,有 6 项研究确定机械因素是受伤的主要原因。与受伤相关的因素包括年龄、性别(女性)和生化特征。另一方面,职业和组织因素包括轮班、外包(承包商)和在该行业工作不满 2 年。

结论

本综述强调,工作相关和个体特征都是与受伤显著相关的因素。此外,常见的受伤健康后果包括死亡率、平均缺勤天数以及永久性、部分或完全残疾。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/11474850/de494c8a3e6a/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/11474850/30187872419b/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/11474850/de494c8a3e6a/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/11474850/30187872419b/bmjopen-14-10-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b7b/11474850/de494c8a3e6a/bmjopen-14-10-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Occupational accidents in mining workers: scoping review of studies published in the last 13 years.矿工职业事故:对过去 13 年发表的研究进行范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e080572. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080572.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The prevalences and levels of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres (silica, asbestos and coal): A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury.粉尘和/或纤维(二氧化硅、石棉和煤)职业接触的流行率和水平:来自世卫组织/劳工组织工作相关疾病和伤害负担联合估算的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2023 Aug;178:107980. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107980. Epub 2023 May 21.
4
Mapping the evidence on the assessment of fitness to work at heights: a scoping review.绘制高处作业适宜性评估的证据图谱:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e093525. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093525.
5
Analysis of the severity of occupational injuries in the mining industry using a Bayesian network.基于贝叶斯网络的矿业职业伤害严重度分析。
Epidemiol Health. 2019;41:e2019017. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2019017. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Exploratory analysis of Spanish energetic mining accidents.西班牙能源矿业事故的探索性分析。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2012;18(2):209-19. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2012.11076929.
7
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
8
Systematic review: Lost-time injuries in the US mining industry.系统评价:美国采矿业的工时损失伤害。
Occup Med (Lond). 2017 Aug 1;67(6):442-447. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqx077.
9
Analyses of non-fatal accidents in an opencast mine by logistic regression model - a case study.基于逻辑回归模型的露天煤矿非致命事故分析——案例研究
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2017 Sep;24(3):328-337. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2016.1178299. Epub 2016 May 11.
10
Occupational Infections Among Workers in Europe: Protocol for a Scoping Review.欧洲工人的职业感染:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 24;14:e59606. doi: 10.2196/59606.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of Mining-Related Injuries in Chinese Coal Mines and Related Risk Factors: A Statistical Research Study Based on a Meta-Analysis.基于荟萃分析的中国煤矿矿难致伤原因及相关危险因素分析:一项统计研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316249.
2
The Characteristics of Accepted Work-related Injuries and Diseases Claims in the Australian Coal Mining Industry.澳大利亚煤矿业已受理的工伤和职业病索赔特征。
Saf Health Work. 2022 Jun;13(2):135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.701. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Risk Factors Identification of Unsafe Acts in Deep Coal Mine Workers Based on Grounded Theory and HFACS.
基于扎根理论和 HFACS 的深部煤矿工人不安全行为致因识别
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;10:852612. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.852612. eCollection 2022.
4
Hand Injuries of Coal Miners in Southern West Virginia: A Pilot Study on Health-Care Resources in Southern West Virginia.西弗吉尼亚州南部煤矿工人的手部损伤:关于西弗吉尼亚州南部医疗资源的一项初步研究。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):18-22. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_39_19. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
Injuries during the first hour at work in the U.S. mining industry.美国采矿业工作第一小时内的伤害。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Dec;63(12):1124-1133. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23186. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
6
Mortality among workers employed in the mining industry in the United States: A 29-year analysis of the National Health Interview Survey-Linked Mortality File, 1986-2014.美国采矿业工人的死亡率:1986-2014 年国家健康访谈调查-死亡档案 29 年分析。
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Oct;63(10):851-858. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23160. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Risk Factors for the Number of Sustained Injuries in Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining Operation.个体和小规模采矿作业中持续性伤害数量的风险因素。
Saf Health Work. 2020 Mar;11(1):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
8
Analysis of Injuries in the Ghanaian Mining Industry and Priority Areas for Research.加纳采矿业的伤害分析及优先研究领域
Saf Health Work. 2019 Jun;10(2):151-165. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
A systematic review of lost-time injuries in the global mining industry.对全球采矿业工伤事故的系统评价。
Work. 2018;60(1):49-61. doi: 10.3233/WOR-182715.