Suppr超能文献

控释地诺前列酮阴道栓剂用于择期预产期前引产的疗效。

Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Dec;50(12):2226-2230. doi: 10.1111/jog.16123. Epub 2024 Oct 13.

Abstract

AIM

The induction of labor before due date has recently been proved to reduce the rate of cesarean sections and is not associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes as compared to expectant management. Controlled-release dinoprostone (PGE) vaginal insert has recently been approved for use in Japan. However, evidence regarding its efficacy in cervical ripening and labor induction before due date remains limited. We aimed to compare the efficacy of PGE vaginal inserts and mechanical dilation for labor induction before due date.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 206 mothers at 37, 38, and 39 weeks' gestation delivered at our institution between January 2021 and October 2022. Perinatal outcomes, including the success rate of vaginal delivery, were compared between the PGE (n = 46) and metreurynter/laminaria tent (non-PGE) (n = 160) groups. The success rate of vaginal delivery was defined as the proportion of women who delivered vaginally within 48 h of initiating oxytocin augmentation.

RESULTS

The success rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE group (37/49, 80.4%) than in the non-PGE group (106/177, 66.2%). Emergency cesarean section related to non-reassuring fetal status was performed with none in the PGE group and with eight (5.0%) in the non-PGE group.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the PGE group for elective labor induction between 37 and 39 weeks. The PGE vaginal insert could increase the success rate of vaginal delivery for elective induction of labor at 39 weeks.

摘要

目的

近期研究证实,择期在预产期前引产可降低剖宫产率,且与期待管理相比,并不增加不良围产儿结局的风险。控释前列腺素 E(PGE)阴道栓剂最近已在日本获准使用。然而,关于其在预产期前宫颈成熟和引产中的疗效的证据仍然有限。我们旨在比较 PGE 阴道栓剂和机械扩张在预产期前引产中的疗效。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 206 名在我们机构于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 10 月间分娩的 37、38 和 39 孕周的产妇。比较了 PGE(n=46)和米索前列醇/海藻棒(非 PGE)(n=160)组的围产儿结局,包括阴道分娩成功率。阴道分娩成功率定义为在开始催产素加强 48 小时内阴道分娩的产妇比例。

结果

PGE 组的阴道分娩成功率明显高于非 PGE 组(37/49,80.4%)(106/177,66.2%)。因胎儿状况不乐观而行急诊剖宫产术,PGE 组无一例,非 PGE 组 8 例(5.0%)。

结论

PGE 组在 37 至 39 孕周择期引产时阴道分娩率明显更高。PGE 阴道栓剂可提高 39 孕周择期引产的阴道分娩成功率。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for elective induction of labor before due date.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Dec;50(12):2226-2230. doi: 10.1111/jog.16123. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
3
Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Dec;27(18):1874-9. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.883375. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
4
Vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 May;32(10):1721-1727. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1416351. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
5
Results of the RE-DINO multicenter randomized trial on the repeated use of vaginal dinoprostone (Propess®) for labor induction in patients at term.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Nov;6(11):101510. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101510. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
7
Optimal cervical-ripening method for labor induction in Japan after the era of controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2024 Jan;50(1):40-46. doi: 10.1111/jog.15812. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
In vivo controlled release of PGE2 from a vaginal insert (0.8 mm, 10 mg) during induction of labour.
BJOG. 2001 Feb;108(2):169-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00039.x.
9
Comparison of the Cook vaginal cervical ripening balloon with prostaglandin E2 insert for induction of labor in late pregnancy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Sep;302(3):579-584. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05597-0. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;59(5):723-727. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2020.07.017.

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized trial of synthetic osmotic cervical dilator for induction of labor vs dinoprostone vaginal insert.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022 Jul;4(4):100628. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100628. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
5
Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert: A Review in Cervical Ripening.
Drugs. 2018 Oct;78(15):1615-1624. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0995-2.
6
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
7
Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best?
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017 Dec;44(4):567-582. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.08.011.
8
The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Aug;296(2):167-179. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4418-5. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
9
Controlled-release dinoprostone insert versus Foley catheter for labor induction: a meta-analysis.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(14):2382-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1086331. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):125.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Jun 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验