Merino Marisa, Del Barrio Jaime, Nuño Roberto, Errea María
Asociación Salud Digital and Osakidetza, Madrid, Spain.
Asociación Salud Digital and Ernst & Young, Madrid, Spain.
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 13;10:20552076241277438. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277438. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
To carry out a systematic literature review to identify the Value Based Digital Health elements.
The search for records was carried out for the period 2012 to January 2024, in two main databases, EMBASE and Scopus. Records were limited to studies published since 2012. Studies presented either a conceptual framework on the concept of Value-Based Digital Health (VBDH), or results from an empirical work to generate evidence on the value of digital health, or a combination of both. The characteristics of the study, the type of digital health and measures and/or their value elements included, are synthesized and interpreted. To synthetize information, the patient journey phases are used as themes, where the identified value elements are allocated. This is analyzed by type of agent (of the general healthcare framework).
The search yielded a total of 606 abstracts for screening. In the end, 67 studies were finally included for data extraction. VBDH elements are presented by phases of the patient journey and by agent. Despite the high heterogeneity of patients, theoretical and empirical works converge in elements such as the value of patient-centered care, education (health literacy) in the use of new digital health technologies, mechanisms to increase patient confidence and their participation in the health decision-making processes, or the importance of collecting patients' reported outcomes and experiences, among other elements. The review also found empty areas among theoretical and empirical studies, where no VBDH elements were identified.
This systematic review identified the theoretical and empirical elements to measure the value of digital health and provides a framework of VBDH elements. Some of the theoretical elements are actually used in practice. Others, however, despite being relevant from a theoretical point of view, do not seem to be measured empirically. This work provides researchers of a source, for consultation, of value based digital health elements. This is helpful for improving the measurement of the value of digital health.
进行一项系统的文献综述,以确定基于价值的数字健康要素。
在2012年至2024年1月期间,在两个主要数据库EMBASE和Scopus中进行记录检索。记录限于2012年以来发表的研究。这些研究要么提出了基于价值的数字健康(VBDH)概念的概念框架,要么是实证研究的结果,以生成关于数字健康价值的证据,或者两者兼而有之。对研究的特征、数字健康的类型以及所包括的措施和/或其价值要素进行综合和解读。为了综合信息,将患者就医阶段用作主题,并分配已确定的价值要素。通过(一般医疗保健框架的)主体类型进行分析。
检索共产生606篇摘要以供筛选。最终,67项研究被纳入数据提取。VBDH要素按患者就医阶段和主体呈现。尽管患者具有高度异质性,但理论和实证研究在一些要素上趋于一致,如以患者为中心的护理的价值、使用新数字健康技术的教育(健康素养)、增强患者信心及其参与健康决策过程的机制,或者收集患者报告的结果和体验的重要性等要素。该综述还发现理论和实证研究中存在空白领域,未识别出VBDH要素。
本系统综述确定了衡量数字健康价值的理论和实证要素,并提供了一个VBDH要素框架。一些理论要素实际上在实践中得到应用。然而,其他一些要素尽管从理论角度来看很相关,但似乎未得到实证衡量。这项工作为研究人员提供了一个基于价值的数字健康要素的咨询来源。这有助于改进数字健康价值的衡量。