London School of Economics and Political Science.
Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Popul Stud (Camb). 2024 Nov;78(3):467-482. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2023.2174266. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
While there is strong evidence that maternal smallpox infection can cause foetal loss, it is not clear whether smallpox infections were a demographically important cause of stillbirths historically. In this paper, we use parish-level data from the Swedish Tabellverket data set for 1780-1839 to test the effect of smallpox on stillbirths quantitatively, analysing periods before and after the introduction of vaccination in 1802. We find that smallpox infection was not a major cause of stillbirths before 1820, because most women contracted smallpox as children and were therefore not susceptible during pregnancy. We do find a small, statistically significant effect of smallpox on stillbirths from 1820 to 1839, when waning immunity from vaccination put a greater share of pregnant women at risk of contracting smallpox. However, the reduced prevalence of smallpox in this period limited its impact on stillbirths. Thus, smallpox was not an important driver of historical stillbirth trends.
虽然有强有力的证据表明母亲感染天花会导致胎儿流产,但尚不清楚天花感染在历史上是否是导致死产的一个重要人口统计学原因。在本文中,我们使用了瑞典 Tabellverket 数据集的教区层面数据,对 1780-1839 年的情况进行了定量分析,考察了 1802 年接种疫苗引入前后的时期。我们发现,在 1820 年之前,天花感染并不是导致死产的主要原因,因为大多数女性在儿童时期就感染了天花,因此在怀孕期间不会受到感染。我们确实发现,从 1820 年到 1839 年,天花对死产的影响较小,但具有统计学意义,因为接种疫苗后的免疫力逐渐减弱,使更多的孕妇面临感染天花的风险。然而,在此期间天花的发病率降低,限制了其对死产的影响。因此,天花并不是历史上死产趋势的重要驱动因素。