Liang Yankun, Zhang Zhenpo, Zheng Jingping, Wang Yuting, He Jiaxin, Zhao Juanzhi, Su Ling
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Endocr Connect. 2024 Nov 25;13(12). doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0404. Print 2024 Dec 1.
Incretin therapies, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), are crucial for type 2 diabetes treatment. Evidence of their association with gallbladder, biliary diseases, and liver injury remains inconsistent. This study evaluated the association between incretin therapies and hepatobiliary adverse events using the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data.
Case reports involving incretin therapies and hepatobiliary events from January 2006 to December 2023 were extracted from FAERS. The association between these agents and hepatobiliary adverse events (hAEs) was analyzed using reporting odds ratios and empirical Bayesian geometric means. Descriptive analyses were conducted to characterize the demographic and clinical features of the hAE cases. Additionally, subgroup analyses calculated reporting odds ratios to evaluate the strength of the association between specific incretin drugs and hAEs.
Among 68,351 case reports associated with incretin-based therapies, 1327 (1.941%) involved hepatobiliary adverse events. DPP-4 inhibitors demonstrated statistically significant associations with multiple hepatobiliary events, like cholelithiasis, chronic cholecystitis, and biliary diseases. In contrast, GLP-1 receptor agonists showed weaker associations, primarily linked to gallbladder and biliary disease risks. Subgroup analyses revealed stronger positive correlations with hepatobiliary events for liraglutide and semaglutide among GLP-1 agonists, and for sitagliptin, linagliptin, and vildagliptin among DPP-4 inhibitors. The pooled reporting odds ratio of 2.85 indicated a positive correlation between these drugs and studied adverse events.
This study found statistically significant associations between DPP-4 inhibitors and hepatobiliary adverse events like cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. GLP-1 agonists showed weaker gallbladder/biliary disorder links but higher acute cholecystitis risk. Subgroup analyses revealed varying correlations among specific drugs, potentially dose-dependent. Further large-scale studies are needed to evaluate class effect differences and elucidate mechanisms for guiding clinical use.
肠促胰岛素疗法,包括二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP-4i)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RA),对2型糖尿病治疗至关重要。其与胆囊、胆道疾病及肝损伤之间关联的证据仍不一致。本研究利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据评估肠促胰岛素疗法与肝胆不良事件之间的关联。
从FAERS中提取2006年1月至2023年12月涉及肠促胰岛素疗法和肝胆事件的病例报告。使用报告比值比和经验贝叶斯几何均值分析这些药物与肝胆不良事件(hAE)之间的关联。进行描述性分析以描述hAE病例的人口统计学和临床特征。此外,亚组分析计算报告比值比以评估特定肠促胰岛素药物与hAE之间关联的强度。
在68351例与基于肠促胰岛素的疗法相关的病例报告中,1327例(1.941%)涉及肝胆不良事件。DPP-4抑制剂与多种肝胆事件,如胆结石、慢性胆囊炎和胆道疾病,表现出统计学上的显著关联。相比之下,GLP-1受体激动剂的关联较弱,主要与胆囊和胆道疾病风险相关。亚组分析显示,在GLP-1激动剂中,利拉鲁肽和司美格鲁肽与肝胆事件的正相关性更强,在DPP-4抑制剂中,西他列汀、利奈格列汀和维格列汀与肝胆事件的正相关性更强。汇总报告比值比为2.85,表明这些药物与所研究的不良事件之间存在正相关。
本研究发现DPP-4抑制剂与胆结石和胆囊炎等肝胆不良事件之间存在统计学上的显著关联。GLP-1激动剂与胆囊/胆道疾病的关联较弱,但急性胆囊炎风险较高。亚组分析显示特定药物之间存在不同的相关性,可能存在剂量依赖性。需要进一步开展大规模研究以评估类别效应差异并阐明指导临床应用的机制。