Suppr超能文献

不同成熟状态的男性青少年田径运动员短跑和跳远成绩的身体决定因素

Physical Determinants of Sprint and Long Jump Performance in Male Youth Track-and-Field Athletes With Differing Maturity Statuses.

作者信息

Baker James, Read Paul, Graham-Smith Philip, Monaco Mauricio, Varamenti Evdokia, Cardinale Marco, Jones Thomas W

机构信息

Aspire Academy for Sports Excellence, Doha,Qatar.

Department of Sports Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne,United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2024 Oct 14:1-12. doi: 10.1123/pes.2023-0150.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the physical determinants of 60-m sprint and long jump (LJ) performance and differences between maturity groups in physical characteristics in young male track-and-field athletes.

METHODS

Competition results, countermovement jump, isometric leg press, 10-5 repeated jump test, and 50-m sprint were collected over 3 seasons for 54 male athletes (age 13 [1] y; stature 160.0 [8.9] cm; body mass, 48.0 [9.8] kg; percentage predicted adult height 92.2% [5.5%]) grouped by maturity status: approaching- (n = 16), circa- (n = 19), and post-peak height velocity (PHV) (n = 19).

RESULTS

There were significant between-group differences in 60 m, LJ, and all physical testing variables (P < .001, g = 0.88-5.44) when comparing the approaching- and circa-PHV groups with the post-PHV group. Significant differences were identified between the approaching- and circa-PHV groups in 40-m (P = .033, g = 0.89), 50-m (P = .024, g = 1.64), and 60-m (P < .001, g = 0.89) sprint times. Countermovement jump and 50-m sprint variables were consistently important for projection of 60 m and LJ performance across the valid multivariate models.

CONCLUSIONS

Large differences in performance across maturity groups highlight the importance of understanding athletes' maturity status to accurately interpret performance. Several physical performance variables were important for projecting competition 60 m and LJ performance.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨了年轻男性田径运动员60米短跑和跳远成绩的身体决定因素,以及成熟度组之间身体特征的差异。

方法

在3个赛季中收集了54名男性运动员(年龄13[1]岁;身高160.0[8.9]厘米;体重48.0[9.8]千克;预测成年身高百分比92.2%[5.5%])的比赛成绩、反向纵跳、等长腿部推举、10-5重复跳跃测试和50米短跑成绩,并按成熟度状态分组:接近青春期(n = 16)、青春期(n = 19)和身高增长高峰期后(PHV)(n = 19)。

结果

将接近青春期组和青春期组与身高增长高峰期后组进行比较时,60米、跳远和所有身体测试变量在组间存在显著差异(P <.001,g = 0.88 - 5.44)。在40米(P =.033,g = 0.89)、50米(P =.024,g = 1.64)和60米(P <.001,g = 0.89)短跑时间上,接近青春期组和青春期组之间存在显著差异。在有效的多变量模型中,反向纵跳和50米短跑变量对于预测60米和跳远成绩始终很重要。

结论

成熟度组之间的成绩差异很大,这凸显了了解运动员成熟状态对于准确解释成绩的重要性。几个身体性能变量对于预测60米比赛和跳远成绩很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验