Suppr超能文献

连续伤口浸润系统能否替代静脉自控镇痛用于单孔腹腔镜术后疼痛管理?

Can a Continuous Wound Infiltration System Replace Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Management after a Single-Port Access Laparoscopy?

作者信息

Kang Jun-Hyeok, Seo Yumi, Lee Hyunji, Kim Woo Young, Paik E Sun

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeoungbu-si 11759, Republic of Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 03181, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 25;13(19):5718. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195718.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether continuous wound infiltration (CWI) can replace intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) and to investigate effective pain control strategies after a single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy for adnexal disease. : A total of 470 patients (the CWI group [n = 109], the IV PCA group [n = 198], and the combined group [n = 163]) who underwent an SPA adnexal laparoscopy and who received CWI or IV PCA for postoperative pain management were retrospectively reviewed. The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h (h) after surgery and the total amount of fentanyl administered via IV PCA were collected. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and the total amount of rescue antiemetic drugs administered were also evaluated. : The mean NRS pain scores at 6 h (combined vs. PCA vs. CWI, 3.08 vs. 3.44 vs. 3.96, < 0.001), 12 h (2.10 vs. 2.65 vs. 2.82, < 0.001), and 24 h (1.71 vs. 2.01 vs. 2.12, < 0.001) after surgery were significantly lower in the combined group. CWI showed a similar pain-reduction effect after surgery compared to IV PCA, except for the acute phase (within 6 h after surgery). The incidence of PONV during the entire hospitalization period was significantly lower in the CWI group compared to the groups using IV PCA ( < 0.05). The combined group had a significantly lower incidence of PONV and use of rescue antiemetics than the IV PCA group ( < 0.05). The combined group required significantly less total PCA fentanyl compared to the IV PCA group (combined vs. PCA, 622.1 μg vs. 703.1 μg, < 0.001). : CWI is an effective alternative to IV PCA and has fewer side effects. Combined use of CWI and IV PCA may be an ideal pain management strategy, offering a strong pain-reduction effect and only moderate side effects.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定持续伤口浸润(CWI)是否可以替代静脉自控镇痛(IV PCA),并探讨单孔腹腔镜附件手术(SPA)后有效的疼痛控制策略。回顾性分析了470例行SPA附件腹腔镜手术并接受CWI或IV PCA进行术后疼痛管理的患者(CWI组[n = 109]、IV PCA组[n = 198]和联合组[n = 163])。收集术后6、12、24和48小时(h)的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分以及通过IV PCA给予的芬太尼总量。还评估了术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率和使用的抢救性止吐药物总量。术后6小时(联合组vs. PCA组vs. CWI组,3.08 vs. 3.44 vs. 3.96,<0.001)、12小时(2.10 vs. 2.65 vs. 2.82,<0.001)和24小时(1.71 vs. 2.01 vs. 2.12,<0.001)联合组的平均NRS疼痛评分显著更低。除急性期(术后6小时内)外,CWI与IV PCA相比在术后显示出相似的镇痛效果。与使用IV PCA的组相比,CWI组在整个住院期间PONV的发生率显著更低(<0.05)。联合组的PONV发生率和抢救性止吐药物的使用显著低于IV PCA组(<0.05)。与IV PCA组相比,联合组所需的PCA芬太尼总量显著更少(联合组vs. PCA组,622.1μg vs. 703.1μg,<0.001)。CWI是IV PCA的有效替代方法,且副作用更少。CWI与IV PCA联合使用可能是一种理想的疼痛管理策略,具有强效镇痛作用且副作用适中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f5b/11477422/78db702bd5b9/jcm-13-05718-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验