Assalman Abdurrahman S, Al Onaizan Faisal, Elgezawi Moataz, Almulhim Khalid S, Abdallah Moamen A, Kaisarly Dalia
Department Restorative Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Substitutive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 9;13(19):6024. doi: 10.3390/jcm13196024.
: The aim of this in vitro investigation is to study the effect of endodontic cavity design on interfacial voids, class II resin composite sealing ability, and fracture resistance in mandibular premolars. : A total of 48 single-rooted mandibular premolars received compound class II preparations with either traditional flare access cavities (group A) or contracted endodontic cavity preparations (group B). Each study group was subdivided according to the coronal restoration into two sub-groups as α and β. In the α group, a microhybrid composite was used after etch-and-rinse bonding technique using an MDP-containing universal adhesive. In the β group, a self-adhesive composite was used as coronal restoration after endodontic treatment ( = 12) for each subgroup. A micro-CT analysis was performed to assess the obturation interfacial voids and tracing of class II cervical interfacial adaptation. The tooth fracture resistance testing was then performed adding an extra group of 12 sound non-prepared teeth, which were tested as the control for fracture strength testing. A one-way ANOVA and post-hoc testing were used together with descriptive statistics for an analysis of the mean values of obturation interfacial voids. A two-way ANOVA was used to assess the fracture resistance test results, and to find the influence of endodontic access design and the type of composite material on the fracture resistance testing. Chi-square testing was employed to analyze the cervical interfacial seal of the class II restorations. : A one-way ANOVA revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between test groups in the amount of obturation interfacial voids ( > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between test groups in terms of cervical interfacial sealing ability ( > 0.05). A two-way ANOVA revealed that no statistically significant differences between test groups including the control group existed in terms of the fracture resistance testing ( > 0.05). : Although it does not improve tooth fracture resistance, the contracted endodontic access cavity does not deteriorate the quality of obturation in terms of the interfacial porosity. The self-adhesive composite does not improve the efficiency of cervical interfacial adaptation or tooth fracture resistance regardless of the endodontic access cavity shape, yet it revealed a substantial load-bearing capacity.
本体外研究的目的是研究根管腔设计对下颌前磨牙界面空隙、Ⅱ类树脂复合体封闭能力及抗折性的影响。
共48颗单根下颌前磨牙接受复合Ⅱ类预备,分为传统扩大型髓腔组(A组)和缩小型根管腔预备组(B组)。每个研究组根据冠部修复情况再细分为α和β两个亚组。α组在使用含MDP的通用粘结剂进行酸蚀冲洗粘结技术后,使用微混合复合树脂。β组在根管治疗后(每组n = 12)使用自粘结复合树脂作为冠部修复材料。进行显微CT分析以评估充填界面空隙及追踪Ⅱ类颈部界面适应性。然后进行牙齿抗折性测试,另外增加一组12颗完好未预备的牙齿作为抗折强度测试的对照。采用单因素方差分析和事后检验以及描述性统计分析充填界面空隙的平均值。采用双因素方差分析评估抗折性测试结果,以确定根管入口设计和复合材料类型对抗折性测试的影响。采用卡方检验分析Ⅱ类修复体的颈部界面封闭情况。
单因素方差分析显示,测试组之间在充填界面空隙量方面无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。测试组之间在颈部界面封闭能力方面无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。双因素方差分析显示,包括对照组在内的测试组之间在抗折性测试方面无统计学显著差异(P > 0.05)。
尽管缩小型根管入口不能提高牙齿抗折性,但就界面孔隙率而言,它不会降低充填质量。无论根管入口腔形状如何,自粘结复合树脂都不能提高颈部界面适应性或牙齿抗折性,但其显示出相当大的承载能力。