• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用国家队列中的行政数据识别原发性胆汁性胆管炎和肝硬化患者。

Identifying Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Cirrhosis Using Administrative Data in a National Cohort.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Miami VA Medical System, and Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Oct;33(10):e70013. doi: 10.1002/pds.70013.

DOI:10.1002/pds.70013
PMID:39415072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of administrative codes to capture patients with both primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and cirrhosis could be challenging because of the potential for incorrect coding due to the old nomenclature "Primary Biliary Cirrhosis." Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the positive predictive value (PPV) of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for PBC and cirrhosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Eligibility criteria included adult patients diagnosed to have PBC and cirrhosis based on one inpatient or two outpatient ICD 9 or 10 codes, and were validated against chart review of each participant.

RESULTS

We identified 1408 patients who were found to have ICD codes for both cirrhosis and PBC. The ICD 9/10 codes for PBC and cirrhosis had a PPV of 0.75 (95% CI 0.73-0.75) for cirrhosis, 0.75 for PBC (95% CI 0.73-0.78), and 0.52 (0.50-0.55) for PBC and cirrhosis. When portal hypertension was combined with ICD 9/10 codes, the PPV of cirrhosis improved to 0.92 (0.90-0.94), and that of PBC cirrhosis improved to 0.64 (0.60-0.67). By combining ICD 9/10 codes for portal hypertension and receipt of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), the PPV for cirrhosis improved to 0.91 (0.88-0.94), PBC increased to 0.78 (0.74-0.82), and that for PBC cirrhosis to 0.69 (0.65-0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large national cohort, the use of ICD 9/10 codes had modest reliability for identifying participants with PBC and cirrhosis. The PPV for cirrhosis can be improved by incorporating ICD 9/10 codes for portal hypertension with receipt of UDCA.

摘要

背景

由于旧的命名法“原发性胆汁性肝硬化”可能导致编码错误,因此行政代码捕捉原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)和肝硬化患者的准确性可能具有挑战性。因此,本研究旨在检查国际疾病分类(ICD)代码用于 PBC 和肝硬化的阳性预测值(PPV)。

方法

这是一项使用退伍军人事务部公司数据仓库数据的回顾性队列研究。纳入标准包括根据一个住院或两个门诊 ICD 9 或 10 代码诊断为患有 PBC 和肝硬化的成年患者,并通过对每位参与者的图表审查进行验证。

结果

我们确定了 1408 名患者,他们的 ICD 代码同时存在肝硬化和 PBC。ICD 9/10 代码用于肝硬化和 PBC 的肝硬化的 PPV 为 0.75(95%CI 0.73-0.75),PBC 为 0.75(95%CI 0.73-0.78),PBC 和肝硬化为 0.52(0.50-0.55)。当门静脉高压与 ICD 9/10 代码相结合时,肝硬化的 PPV 提高到 0.92(0.90-0.94),PBC 肝硬化的 PPV 提高到 0.64(0.60-0.67)。通过结合 ICD 9/10 代码门静脉高压和熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)的使用,肝硬化的 PPV 提高到 0.91(0.88-0.94),PBC 增加到 0.78(0.74-0.82),PBC 肝硬化提高到 0.69(0.65-0.74)。

结论

在一个大型的全国队列中,ICD 9/10 代码用于识别 PBC 和肝硬化患者的可靠性适中。通过将 ICD 9/10 代码门静脉高压与 UDCA 的使用相结合,可以提高肝硬化的 PPV。

相似文献

1
Identifying Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Cirrhosis Using Administrative Data in a National Cohort.使用国家队列中的行政数据识别原发性胆汁性胆管炎和肝硬化患者。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Oct;33(10):e70013. doi: 10.1002/pds.70013.
2
Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases-10 Codes for Cirrhosis and Portal Hypertensive Complications.国际疾病分类第 10 版编码对肝硬化及门静脉高压并发症的准确性。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Aug;67(8):3623-3631. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07282-x. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
3
Coding algorithms for identifying patients with cirrhosis and hepatitis B or C virus using administrative data.使用管理数据识别肝硬化和乙型或丙型肝炎病毒患者的编码算法。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):107-11. doi: 10.1002/pds.3721. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
4
ICD-10-AM codes for cirrhosis and related complications: key performance considerations for population and healthcare studies.ICD-10-AM 编码用于肝硬化及相关并发症:人群和医疗保健研究的关键绩效考量。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Sep;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000485.
5
Validation of Risk Scoring Systems in Ursodeoxycholic Acid-Treated Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis.熊去氧胆酸治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者的风险评分系统的验证。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul;114(7):1101-1108. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000290.
6
Validation of coding algorithms for the identification of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis using administrative data.使用管理数据验证用于识别原发性胆汁性肝硬化患者的编码算法
Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;24(3):175-82. doi: 10.1155/2010/237860.
7
International Classification of Diseases Codes are Useful in Identifying Cirrhosis in Administrative Databases.国际疾病分类代码可用于在管理数据库中识别肝硬化。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):2107-2122. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07076-1. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
8
Predictive factors for decompensating events in patients with cirrhosis with primary biliary cholangitis under different lines of therapy.不同治疗方案下原发性胆汁性胆管炎肝硬化患者失代偿事件的预测因素。
Hepatology. 2024 Oct 1;80(4):791-806. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000826. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Use of administrative claims data for identifying patients with cirrhosis.利用行政索赔数据识别肝硬化患者。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 May-Jun;47(5):e50-4. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182688d2f.
10
Validity of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Codes for Cirrhosis.国际疾病分类第十版肝硬化编码的有效性。
Dig Dis. 2021;39(3):243-246. doi: 10.1159/000510981. Epub 2020 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of illness for patients with primary biliary cholangitis: an observational study of clinical characteristics and healthcare resource utilization.原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者的疾病负担:一项关于临床特征和医疗资源利用的观察性研究
J Comp Eff Res. 2025 Apr;14(4):e240174. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0174. Epub 2025 Mar 6.