Graber Mark L, Winters Bradford D, Matin Roni, Cholankeril Rosann T, Murphy Daniel R, Singh Hardeep, Bradford Andrea
Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Oct 18;12(2):153-162. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0113. eCollection 2025 May 1.
Cancer will affect more than one in three U.S. residents in their lifetime, and although the diagnosis will be made efficiently in most of these cases, roughly one in five patients will experience a delayed or missed diagnosis. In this integrative review, we focus on missed opportunities in the diagnosis of breast, lung, and colorectal cancer in the ambulatory care environment. From a review of 493 publications, we summarize the current evidence regarding the contributing factors to missed or delayed cancer diagnosis in ambulatory care, as well as evidence to support possible strategies for intervention. Cancer diagnoses are made after follow-up of a positive screening test or an incidental finding, or most commonly, by following up and clarifying non-specific initial presentations to primary care. Breakdowns and delays are unacceptably common in each of these pathways, representing failures to follow-up on abnormal test results, incidental findings, non-specific symptoms, or consults. Interventions aimed at 'closing the loop' represent an opportunity to improve the timeliness of cancer diagnosis and reduce the harm from diagnostic errors. Improving patient engagement, using 'safety netting,' and taking advantage of the functionality offered through health information technology are all viable options to address these problems.
癌症将影响超过三分之一的美国居民一生,尽管在大多数情况下能够有效诊断,但仍约有五分之一的患者会经历诊断延迟或漏诊。在这篇综合性综述中,我们聚焦于门诊医疗环境中乳腺癌、肺癌和结直肠癌诊断过程中错失的机会。通过对493篇出版物的回顾,我们总结了当前关于门诊医疗中导致癌症诊断漏诊或延迟的影响因素的证据,以及支持可能的干预策略的证据。癌症诊断是在对阳性筛查试验或偶然发现进行随访后做出的,或者最常见的是,通过对初级保健中非特异性初始症状进行随访和明确诊断。在这些途径中的每一个环节,诊断失误和延迟都普遍得令人无法接受,这表现为对异常检测结果、偶然发现、非特异性症状或会诊未能进行随访。旨在“闭环”的干预措施是一个改善癌症诊断及时性并减少诊断错误危害的机会。提高患者参与度、采用“安全网”措施以及利用健康信息技术提供的功能都是解决这些问题的可行选择。